• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对冲突强度的注意力调整:来自操纵侧翼刺激-目标刺激刺激间隔对反应时间和刺激前瞳孔大小影响的证据。

Attentional adjustment to conflict strength: evidence from the effects of manipulating flanker-target SOA on response times and prestimulus pupil size.

作者信息

Wendt Mike, Kiesel Andrea, Geringswald Franziska, Purmann Sascha, Fischer Rico

机构信息

Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, <location>Germany</location>

University of Würzburg, <location>Germany</location>

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):55-67. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000227.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000227
PMID:24149239
Abstract

Current models of cognitive control assume gradual adjustment of processing selectivity to the strength of conflict evoked by distractor stimuli. Using a flanker task, we varied conflict strength by manipulating target and distractor onset. Replicating previous findings, flanker interference effects were larger on trials associated with advance presentation of the flankers compared to simultaneous presentation. Controlling for stimulus and response sequence effects by excluding trials with feature repetitions from stimulus administration (Experiment 1) or from the statistical analyses (Experiment 2), we found a reduction of the flanker interference effect after high-conflict predecessor trials (i.e., trials associated with advance presentation of the flankers) but not after low-conflict predecessor trials (i.e., trials associated with simultaneous presentation of target and flankers). This result supports the assumption of conflict-strength-dependent adjustment of visual attention. The selective adaptation effect after high-conflict trials was associated with an increase in prestimulus pupil diameter, possibly reflecting increased cognitive effort of focusing attention.

摘要

当前的认知控制模型假定,加工选择性会根据干扰刺激引发的冲突强度进行逐步调整。我们使用了侧翼任务,通过操纵目标和干扰物的呈现时间来改变冲突强度。与之前的研究结果一致,与侧翼刺激提前呈现相关的试验相比,同时呈现时的侧翼干扰效应更大。通过在刺激呈现过程中排除具有特征重复的试验(实验1)或在统计分析中排除这些试验(实验2)来控制刺激和反应序列效应,我们发现在高冲突前驱试验(即与侧翼刺激提前呈现相关的试验)之后,侧翼干扰效应会降低,但在低冲突前驱试验(即与目标和侧翼刺激同时呈现相关的试验)之后则不会。这一结果支持了视觉注意的冲突强度依赖性调整这一假设。高冲突试验后的选择性适应效应与刺激前瞳孔直径的增加有关,这可能反映了集中注意力时认知努力的增加。

相似文献

1
Attentional adjustment to conflict strength: evidence from the effects of manipulating flanker-target SOA on response times and prestimulus pupil size.对冲突强度的注意力调整:来自操纵侧翼刺激-目标刺激刺激间隔对反应时间和刺激前瞳孔大小影响的证据。
Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):55-67. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000227.
2
Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.冲突频率影响侧翼干扰:刺激集合特定练习和侧翼反应偶联的作用。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):206-17. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.206.
3
Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.在等概率一致和不一致条件下的侧抑制任务不会引发冲突 N2。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Feb;55(2). doi: 10.1111/psyp.12980. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
4
Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.冲突控制中选择性注意的临时和情境依赖调整:一项使用视觉探针的ERP研究
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.052. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
The conflict adaptation is affected by attentional strategies: evidence from the arrow flanker task.冲突适应受注意策略影响:来自箭头侧翼任务的证据。
Sci China C Life Sci. 2009 Oct;52(10):990-4. doi: 10.1007/s11427-009-0123-3. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
6
Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing.多感觉通道处理中控制适应的功能特征
Brain Cogn. 2015 Jun;96:43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Conflict-induced perceptual filtering.冲突引发的感知过滤。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):675-86. doi: 10.1037/a0025902. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
8
Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection.缺乏感知选择的冲突调节。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
9
Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.认知控制的试验内情境适应:来自冲突任务组合的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Oct;42(10):1505-32. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000229. Epub 2016 May 5.
10
Electrophysiological correlates of proportion congruency manipulation in a temporal flanker task.时距 Flanker 任务中比例一致性操作的电生理相关性。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Nov;59(11):e14092. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14092. Epub 2022 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic modulation of spatial selection: Online and anticipatory adjustments in the flanker task.空间选择的动态调制:侧翼任务中的在线和预期调整
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):794-814. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03026-5. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Self-referential information optimizes conflict adaptation.自我参照信息优化冲突适应。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):648-662. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01490-8. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
Neural spatio-temporal patterns of information processing related to cognitive conflict and correct or false recognitions.
与认知冲突和正确或错误识别相关的信息处理的神经时空模式。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 28;12(1):5271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09141-9.
4
Multiple Routes to Control in the Prime-Target Task: Congruence Sequence Effects Emerge Due to Modulation of Irrelevant Prime Activity and Utilization of Temporal Order Information.在首要目标任务中实现控制的多种途径:由于无关启动刺激活动的调制和时间顺序信息的利用,出现了一致性序列效应。
J Cogn. 2021 Mar 10;4(1):18. doi: 10.5334/joc.143.
5
Phasic pupillary responses modulate object-based attentional prioritization.相位瞳孔反应调节基于对象的注意力优先化。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1491-1507. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02232-7. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Memory effects of conflict and cognitive control are processing stage-specific: evidence from pupillometry.冲突和认知控制的记忆效应具有加工阶段特异性:来自瞳孔测量的证据。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1029-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01295-3. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
7
Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.冲突监测与情感信号假说——综合述评。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):193-216. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9.
8
Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.埃里克森侧翼任务中的冲突解决:与西蒙任务的相似与不同。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214203. eCollection 2019.
9
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.经皮迷走神经刺激(tVNS)可增强冲突引发的认知控制调整。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Aug;18(4):680-693. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0596-2.
10
Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review.瞳孔扩张作为认知控制任务努力程度的指标:综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2005-2015. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y.