• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲突和认知控制的记忆效应具有加工阶段特异性:来自瞳孔测量的证据。

Memory effects of conflict and cognitive control are processing stage-specific: evidence from pupillometry.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1029-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01295-3. Epub 2020 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01295-3
PMID:32036444
Abstract

An increasing number of studies in the conflict/control and perceptual desirable difficulty literatures show memory benefits for information in high-conflict task situations. Recent work suggests that increased conflict does not produce a task-wide encoding benefit; rather, conflict must focus high-level attention on to-be-tested information to produce an encoding benefit. We used pupil dilation measures to directly assess this stage-specific model of conflict-encoding effects. We show clear performance costs of incongruency (slower RT and larger pupil dilation) with both semantic and response distractors, but show memory benefits only with semantic conflict. Further, when participants were encouraged to focus more (eliciting greater endogenous effort and control for all trials, not just incongruent trials), we observe larger and more similar pupil responses and reduced memory differences between high versus low semantic conflict conditions. These data confirm and extend a stage-specific model of conflict-encoding effects, with converging behavioural and physiological data.

摘要

越来越多的冲突/控制和感知期望难度文献中的研究表明,在高冲突任务情境下,信息的记忆会得到提升。最近的研究表明,增加冲突并不会产生广泛的任务编码益处;相反,冲突必须将高层注意力集中在待测试的信息上,才能产生编码益处。我们使用瞳孔扩张测量来直接评估这种特定于冲突编码效应的阶段模型。我们发现,无论是语义还是反应干扰,不一致都会导致明显的表现成本(反应时更慢,瞳孔扩张更大),但只有在语义冲突时才会产生记忆益处。此外,当我们鼓励参与者更加专注时(在所有试验中引发更大的内源性努力和控制,而不仅仅是不一致的试验),我们观察到更大和更相似的瞳孔反应,并且减少了高语义冲突条件与低语义冲突条件之间的记忆差异。这些数据证实并扩展了冲突编码效应的特定于阶段的模型,具有趋同的行为和生理数据。

相似文献

1
Memory effects of conflict and cognitive control are processing stage-specific: evidence from pupillometry.冲突和认知控制的记忆效应具有加工阶段特异性:来自瞳孔测量的证据。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1029-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01295-3. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
2
Congruency Encoding Effects on Recognition Memory: A Stage-Specific Account of Desirable Difficulty.一致性编码对识别记忆的影响:理想难度的阶段特异性解释。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00858. eCollection 2019.
3
The Task-Evoked Pupil Response in Divided Auditory Attention Tasks.听觉注意力分散任务中的任务诱发瞳孔反应。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Apr;30(4):264-272. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17060. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Reward elicits cognitive control over emotional distraction: Evidence from pupillometry.奖励引发对情绪分心的认知控制:瞳孔测量的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):537-554. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00669-w.
5
Foggy windows: Pupillary responses during task preparation.模糊的窗户:任务准备期间的瞳孔反应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2235-2248. doi: 10.1177/1747021817740856. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
6
Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review.瞳孔扩张作为认知控制任务努力程度的指标:综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2005-2015. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y.
7
The Influence of Hearing Loss on Cognitive Control in an Auditory Conflict Task: Behavioral and Pupillometry Findings.听力损失对听觉冲突任务中认知控制的影响:行为学和瞳孔测量结果
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2483-2492. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00107. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.在斯特鲁普任务中反应时间和瞳孔扩张的分离。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(10):1899-1909. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000690. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.使用扫视二对一颜色反应映射和反应前瞳孔测量法评估Stroop任务中的刺激-刺激(语义)冲突。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2601-10. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0971-9.
10
Effort during visual search and counting: insights from pupillometry.视觉搜索和计数过程中的努力:瞳孔测量法的见解。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Feb;60(2):211-29. doi: 10.1080/17470210600673818.

引用本文的文献

1
Response-Category Conflict and Control Mode Determine Memory Performance for Distractors in a Flanker Paradigm.反应类别冲突与控制模式决定侧翼范式中干扰项的记忆表现。
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 10;7(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.338. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.通过对强化事件的偶然记忆来评估刺激-控制联想的学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1599-1621. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001058. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3
How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.

本文引用的文献

1
Congruency Encoding Effects on Recognition Memory: A Stage-Specific Account of Desirable Difficulty.一致性编码对识别记忆的影响:理想难度的阶段特异性解释。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00858. eCollection 2019.
2
Pupil size reflects successful encoding and recall of memory in humans.瞳孔大小反映了人类在记忆编码和提取方面的成功程度。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 21;8(1):4949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23197-6.
3
Attentional influences on memory formation: A tale of a not-so-simple story.注意力对记忆形成的影响:一个并非那么简单的故事。
认知冲突如何影响学习判断:评估加工流畅性和元记忆信念的贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):912-922. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01143-8. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):544-557. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0784-2.
4
A cow on the prairie vs. a cow on the street: long-term consequences of semantic conflict on episodic encoding.草原上的奶牛与街道上的奶牛:语义冲突对情景编码的长期影响。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1264-1275. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0805-y. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
5
Perceptual blurring and recognition memory: A desirable difficulty effect revealed.知觉模糊与识别记忆:一种理想的困难效应被揭示。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.习惯(与控制)的产物:关于一致性效应调节的多层次学习视角
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 6;5:1247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247. eCollection 2014.
7
Inhibition-induced forgetting: when more control leads to less memory.抑制性遗忘:更多的控制如何导致记忆减退。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):27-38. doi: 10.1177/0956797614553945. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis.冲突适应的特异性由什么决定?综述、批判性分析与综合建议。
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 8;5:1134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01134. eCollection 2014.
9
Selective attention and recognition: effects of congruency on episodic learning.选择性注意与识别:一致性对情景学习的影响。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):411-24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0572-6. Epub 2014 May 24.
10
Attentional adjustment to conflict strength: evidence from the effects of manipulating flanker-target SOA on response times and prestimulus pupil size.对冲突强度的注意力调整:来自操纵侧翼刺激-目标刺激刺激间隔对反应时间和刺激前瞳孔大小影响的证据。
Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):55-67. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000227.