Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana , Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Mar 1;12(1):66-73. eCollection 2013.
No previous research in squash has considered the time between shots or the proximity of the ball to a wall, which are two important variables that influence shot outcomes. The aim of this paper was to analyse shot types to determine the extent to which they are played in different court areas and a more detailed analysis to determine whether the time available had an influence on the shot selected. Ten elite matches, contested by fifteen of the world's top right handed squash players (age 27 ± 3.2, height 1.81 ± 0.06 m, weight 76.3 ± 3.7 kg), at the men's World Team Championships were processed using the SAGIT/Squash tracking system with shot information manually added to the system. Results suggested that shot responses were dependent upon court location and the time between shots. When these factors were considered repeatable performance existed to the extent that one of two shots was typically played when there was limited time to play the shot (< 1.20s). For example, it was clear that when players did not have a lot of time to hit the ball (low time i.e. < 1.06s, and mid time i.e. 1.06 - 1.20s) in the front left corner close to the side wall, the crosscourt lob was used frequently (44.30% and 36.31% respectively) whereas when there was more time this shot was seldom used (13.64%). Consequently variant and invariant behaviour were shown to exist in elite squash although for the first time it was suggested that the availability of time to play a shot contributed to which of these behaviours was evident. This analysis could be extended by adopting a case study approach to see how individual differences in strategy and tactics affect shot selections. Key pointsPrevious research has suggested that a playing strategy, elements decided in advance of the match, may be evident for elite players by examining court location and preceding shot type, however these parameters alone are unlikely to be sufficient predictors.At present there is no known analysis in squash, or indeed in any of the racket sports, that has quantified the time available to respond to different shot types. An understanding of the time interval between shots and the movement characteristics of the player responding to different shots according to the court positions might facilitate a better understanding of the dynamics that determine shot selection.Some elements of a general playing strategy were evident e.g. predominately hitting to the back left of the court, but tactical differences in shot selection were also evident on the basis of court location and time available to play a shot.
以前在壁球运动中没有研究过击球之间的时间或球与墙壁的接近程度,这两个重要变量会影响击球结果。本文的目的是分析击球类型,以确定它们在不同场地区域的使用程度,并进行更详细的分析,以确定可用时间是否会影响所选击球类型。在男子世界团体锦标赛中,对 15 名世界顶级右手壁球运动员(年龄 27 ± 3.2 岁,身高 1.81 ± 0.06 m,体重 76.3 ± 3.7 kg)的 10 场精英比赛进行了处理,使用 SAGIT/Squash 跟踪系统处理比赛信息,并手动将击球信息添加到系统中。结果表明,击球反应取决于场地位置和击球之间的时间。当考虑到这些因素时,重复性表现存在,以至于在击球时间有限(<1.20s)的情况下,通常会选择两种击球中的一种。例如,当球员在靠近侧墙的前场左角没有很多时间击球(低时间,即<1.06s,中时间,即 1.06-1.20s)时,很明显交叉吊高球经常被使用(分别为 44.30%和 36.31%),而当有更多时间时,这种击球很少被使用(13.64%)。因此,尽管这是第一次表明可用击球时间会影响这些行为的表现,但在壁球精英运动员中表现出了可变性和不变性行为。通过采用案例研究方法,可以扩展这种分析,以了解策略和战术的个体差异如何影响击球选择。关键点:以前的研究表明,通过检查场地位置和前一个击球类型,对于精英运动员来说,一种预先决定的比赛策略,即元素可能是明显的,然而这些参数本身不太可能成为足够的预测因素。目前,在壁球运动中,或者在任何球拍运动中,都没有已知的分析方法可以量化对不同击球类型做出反应的可用时间。了解击球之间的时间间隔以及根据场地位置响应不同击球的球员的运动特征,可能有助于更好地理解决定击球选择的动态。一般比赛策略的一些要素是明显的,例如主要击球到球场的后左角,但根据可用场地和击球时间,在击球选择方面也存在战术差异。