Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):679-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c4d324.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and factorial validity of agility tests used in soccer. One hundred fifty (n = 150), elite, male, junior soccer players, members of the First Junior League Team, volunteered to participate in the study. The slalom test (ST) sprint 4 x 5 m (S4 x 5) and sprint 9-3-6-3-6-9 m with 180 degree turns (S180 degrees) tests had a greater reliability coefficient (alpha = 0.992, 0.979, and 0.976), whereas the within-subject variation ranged between 2.9 and 5.6%. The mentioned 6 agility tests resulted in the extraction of 2 significant components. The S4 x 5 test had the lowest correlation coefficient with the first component (r = 0.38), whereas the correlation coefficients of the other 5 agility tests were higher than 0.63. The T-test (TT) showed statistically significant differences between the defenders and midfielders (p < 0.05) and between the defenders and attackers (p < 0.05). Statistical significant differences were determined between the attackers and defenders in the sprint 9-3-6-3-9 m with backward and forward running (SBF) and p < 0.05. It can be concluded that of the 6 agility tests used in this study, the SBF, TT, and S180 degrees are the most reliable and valid tests for estimating the agility of soccer players. According to the results of the study, the TT proved to be the most appropriate for estimating the agility of defenders, the SBF, and S180 degrees for estimating the agility of midfielders, whereas the S4 x 5 test can be used for estimating the agility of attackers.
本研究的目的是评估足球中使用的敏捷测试的可靠性和因子有效性。150 名(n=150)精英、男性、初级足球运动员,第一初级联赛队的成员,自愿参加了这项研究。变向跑测试(ST)冲刺 4 x 5 米(S4 x 5)和冲刺 9-3-6-3-6-9 米并 180 度转弯(S180 度)测试的可靠性系数更高(α=0.992、0.979 和 0.976),而个体内变异范围在 2.9%至 5.6%之间。上述 6 项敏捷测试共提取出 2 个显著成分。S4 x 5 测试与第一成分的相关系数最低(r=0.38),而其他 5 项敏捷测试的相关系数高于 0.63。T 检验(TT)显示防守者和中场球员之间(p<0.05)以及防守者和进攻者之间(p<0.05)存在统计学上的显著差异。在向后和向前跑的冲刺 9-3-6-3-9 米(SBF)中,进攻者和防守者之间也确定了统计学上的显著差异(p<0.05)。可以得出结论,在本研究中使用的 6 项敏捷测试中,SBF、TT 和 S180 度是评估足球运动员敏捷性最可靠和有效的测试。根据研究结果,TT 被证明是评估防守者敏捷性最适当的测试,SBF 和 S180 度是评估中场球员敏捷性最适当的测试,而 S4 x 5 测试可用于评估进攻者的敏捷性。