Salazar Antonio J, Aguirre Diego A, Ocampo Juliana, Camacho Juan C, Díaz Xavier A
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Los Andes, Carrera 1 Este No. 19A-40, Bogotá, Colombia,
J Digit Imaging. 2014 Apr;27(2):280-6. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9651-2.
This study focused on the effects of pneumothorax size quantification in digital radiology environments when a quantification method is selected according to the radiologist's criteria. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of factors, including the radiologist (with different experience), displays (medical-grade and consumer-grade displays), or display calibration, on the Rhea, Collins, and Light quantification methods. This study used a factorial design with 76 cases, including 16 pneumothorax cases observed by six radiologists on three displays with and without the DICOM standard calibration. The gold standard was established by two radiologists by using computed tomography. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the pneumothorax sizes. For the three quantifications methods, none of the evaluated factors were significant. We conclude that radiologists, displays, and calibration do not significantly affect the quantification of pneumothorax size in different digital radiology environments.
本研究聚焦于在数字放射学环境中,根据放射科医生的标准选择量化方法时气胸大小量化的影响。本研究的目的是评估包括放射科医生(经验不同)、显示器(医用级和消费级显示器)或显示器校准等因素对瑞亚、柯林斯和莱特量化方法的影响。本研究采用析因设计,有76个病例,包括6名放射科医生在三台经过和未经过DICOM标准校准的显示器上观察的16例气胸病例。两名放射科医生通过计算机断层扫描建立了金标准。对气胸大小进行了方差分析(ANOVA)。对于这三种量化方法,所评估的因素均无显著影响。我们得出结论,在不同的数字放射学环境中,放射科医生、显示器和校准对气胸大小的量化没有显著影响。