Ropposch Thorsten, Walch Christian, Avian Alexander, Mausser Gerlinde, Spary Manuela
ENT-University Hospital Graz, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 26/28, 8036, Graz, Austria,
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov;271(11):2897-904. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2780-x. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
To analyze the effects of the depth of anesthesia on inner ear function measured with distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 2f 1 - f 2. Thirty patients who underwent tonsillectomy under general anesthesia (GA) were included. Patients were assigned randomly to one of two groups: group 1 (n = 15) received propofol, group 2 (n = 15) sevoflurane as anesthetic agent. The sedation level was assessed by the bispectral index system. DPOAE measurements were performed before premedication (T 1), 5 min after premedication (T 2), 3 min after induction of general anesthesia (T 3) and every 10 min (T 4, T 5) thereafter until the end of surgery at about 23 min post-anesthetic induction, while sedation levels were obtained starting at the beginning until the end of anesthesia. After premedication, both blood oxygen saturation and heart rate decreased. Following induction of anesthesia systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased, while, as expected, the level of sedation increased. Analyzing the propofol and sevoflurane group separately, both groups showed comparable overall courses of DPOAE levels at higher frequencies (2.8 kHz p = 0.310, 4 kHz p = 0.193, 6 kHz p = 0.269, 8 kHz p = 0.223) and no changes of DPOAE levels compared with baseline values were observed. At T5 the 1 kHz DPOAE level increased in the propofol group and slightly decreased in the sevoflurane group (p < 0.001). While the 1.4 kHz DPOAE level in the propofol group did not change over time the 1.4 kHz DPOAE level decreased in the sevoflurane group (baseline to T 4 p = 0.045; Baseline to T 5 p = 0.004). While overall there were different courses between these two groups in the 2 kHz DPOAE level, in the post hoc analysis only a tendency in the change from baseline to T 4 could be observed (p = 0.082). These results indicate that while the amplitudes of certain DPOAEs were influenced by GA, the depth of anesthesia had no effect on this measure of cochlear function in clinical routine. Therefore, DPOAE measurements in sedation and during GA are useful but the effect of anesthetic agents on DPOAE levels needs to be taken into account when analyzing the test.
分析麻醉深度对用畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)在2f1 - f2频率下测量的内耳功能的影响。纳入30例在全身麻醉(GA)下接受扁桃体切除术的患者。患者被随机分为两组之一:第1组(n = 15)接受丙泊酚,第2组(n = 15)接受七氟醚作为麻醉剂。通过脑电双频指数系统评估镇静水平。在术前用药前(T1)、术前用药后5分钟(T2)、全身麻醉诱导后3分钟(T3)以及此后每10分钟(T4、T5)进行DPOAE测量,直至麻醉诱导后约23分钟手术结束,同时从麻醉开始至结束获取镇静水平。术前用药后,血氧饱和度和心率均下降。麻醉诱导后收缩压和舒张压下降,而正如预期的那样,镇静水平升高。分别分析丙泊酚组和七氟醚组,两组在较高频率(2.8 kHz,p = 0.310;4 kHz,p = 0.193;6 kHz,p = 0.269;8 kHz,p = 0.223)的DPOAE水平总体变化过程相似,且与基线值相比未观察到DPOAE水平的变化。在T5时,丙泊酚组1 kHz的DPOAE水平升高,七氟醚组略有下降(p < 0.001)。丙泊酚组1.4 kHz的DPOAE水平随时间未发生变化,而七氟醚组1.4 kHz的DPOAE水平下降(基线至T4,p = 0.045;基线至T5,p = 0.004)。虽然两组在2 kHz的DPOAE水平总体变化过程不同,但在事后分析中仅观察到从基线至T4有变化趋势(p = 0.082)。这些结果表明,虽然某些DPOAE的幅度受全身麻醉影响,但在临床常规中麻醉深度对这种耳蜗功能测量指标无影响。因此,在镇静和全身麻醉期间进行DPOAE测量是有用的,但在分析测试结果时需要考虑麻醉剂对DPOAE水平的影响。