• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验丰富的防暴警察的强化威胁检测:来自人群中面孔效应的认知证据。

Enhanced threat detection in experienced riot police officers: cognitive evidence from the face-in-the-crowd effect.

作者信息

Damjanovic Ljubica, Pinkham Amy E, Clarke Philip, Phillips Jeremy

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Chester , Chester , UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 May;67(5):1004-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.839724. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2013.839724
PMID:24152089
Abstract

We explored how varying levels of professional expertise in hostile crowd management could enhance threat detection capabilities as assessed by the face in the crowd paradigm. Trainee police officers and more experienced police officers specialized in, and having extensive experience with, riot control, were compared with participants with no experience in hostile crowd management on their search times and accuracy levels in detecting angry and happy face targets against a display of emotional and neutral distractor faces. The experienced officers relative to their trainee counterparts and nonpolice controls showed enhanced detection for threatening faces in both types of display along with a greater degree of inhibitory control over angry face distractors. These findings help to reinforce the ecological validity of the face in the crowd paradigm and provide a new theoretical link for the role of individual differences on the attentional processing of socially relevant stimuli.

摘要

我们探讨了在人群中管理敌对人群方面不同水平的专业知识如何增强威胁检测能力,这一能力通过人群中的面孔范式进行评估。将实习警察以及专门从事防暴控制并拥有丰富经验的经验更丰富的警察,与在管理敌对人群方面没有经验的参与者在检测愤怒和高兴面孔目标时的搜索时间和准确率进行了比较,这些目标呈现于情绪化和中性干扰面孔之中。相对于实习警察和非警察对照组,经验丰富的警察在两种显示类型中对威胁性面孔的检测能力增强,并且对愤怒面孔干扰物具有更强的抑制控制能力。这些发现有助于加强人群中的面孔范式的生态效度,并为个体差异在社会相关刺激的注意力加工中的作用提供新的理论联系。

相似文献

1
Enhanced threat detection in experienced riot police officers: cognitive evidence from the face-in-the-crowd effect.经验丰富的防暴警察的强化威胁检测:来自人群中面孔效应的认知证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 May;67(5):1004-18. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.839724. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
2
The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities.人群中的面孔效应:使用真实面孔和多个身份时的愤怒优势。
Emotion. 2010 Feb;10(1):141-6. doi: 10.1037/a0017387.
3
Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?在人群中注视面部任务:为什么愤怒的面孔被更快发现?
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e93914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093914. eCollection 2014.
4
Attentional biases using the body in the crowd task: are angry body postures detected more rapidly?使用人群中的身体任务的注意偏差:愤怒的身体姿势是否被更快地察觉?
Cogn Emot. 2011 Jun;25(4):700-8. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.495881.
5
Modeling automatic threat detection: development of a face-in-the-crowd task.建模自动威胁检测:人群中面孔检测任务的开发。
Emotion. 2011 Feb;11(1):153-68. doi: 10.1037/a0022018.
6
Looking for foes and friends: perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd.寻找敌友:在人群中识别面孔时的感知与情感因素
Emotion. 2005 Dec;5(4):379-95. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.379.
7
A threat-detection advantage in those with autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍患者的威胁检测优势。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Apr;69(3):472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
8
The attentional processes underlying impaired inhibition of threat in anxiety: the remote distractor effect.焦虑中威胁抑制受损的注意过程:远程分心效应。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(5):934-42. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.630990. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
9
Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.无人关注的面部表情会不对称地影响非情感信息的同步处理。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Sep;17(9):1386-95. doi: 10.1162/0898929054985437.
10
Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces.神经证据表明威胁检测具有优势:对愤怒和快乐的面孔有不同的注意力分配。
Psychophysiology. 2011 May;48(5):697-707. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01130.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The label-feedback effect is influenced by target category in visual search.标签反馈效应在视觉搜索中受目标类别影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0306736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306736. eCollection 2024.
2
Trustworthiness and electrocortical processing of emotionally ambiguous faces in student police officers.情绪模糊面孔的可信度和脑电加工在学生警察中的研究
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2021 Jan 30;307:111237. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111237. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
Brief Report: Reduced Prioritization of Facial Threat in Adults with Autism.
简短报告:自闭症成年人对面部威胁的优先处理能力降低
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Apr;46(4):1471-6. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2664-6.
4
Contrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual search.情感视觉搜索中情感的垂直与水平表征对比。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):62-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0884-6.
5
Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?在人群中注视面部任务:为什么愤怒的面孔被更快发现?
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e93914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093914. eCollection 2014.