• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险评估与风险管理中的基础问题。

Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management.

作者信息

Aven Terje, Zio Enrico

机构信息

University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2014 Jul;34(7):1164-72. doi: 10.1111/risa.12132. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12132
PMID:24152111
Abstract

This is a perspective article on foundational issues in risk assessment and management. The aim is to discuss the needs, obstacles, and challenges for the establishment of a renewed, strong scientific foundation for risk assessment and risk management suited for the current and future technological challenges. The focus is on (i) reviewing and discussing the present situation and (ii) identifying how to best proceed in the future, to develop the risk discipline in the directions needed. The article provides some reflections on the interpretation and understanding of the concept of "foundations of risk assessment and risk management" and the challenges therein. One main recommendation is that different arenas and moments for discussion are needed to specifically address foundational issues in a way that embraces the many disciplinary communities involved (from social scientists to engineers, from behavioral scientists to statisticians, from health physicists to lawyers, etc.). One such opportunity is sought in the constitution of a novel specialty group of the Society of Risk Analysis.

摘要

这是一篇关于风险评估与管理基础问题的观点文章。目的是探讨为适应当前及未来技术挑战,建立一个全新、坚实的风险评估与风险管理科学基础的需求、障碍和挑战。重点在于:(i)回顾和讨论当前形势;(ii)确定未来如何以最佳方式推进,使风险学科朝着所需方向发展。本文对“风险评估与风险管理基础”概念的解释与理解以及其中的挑战进行了一些思考。一个主要建议是,需要不同的讨论领域和时机,以一种涵盖众多相关学科群体(从社会科学家到工程师,从行为科学家到统计学家,从健康物理学家到律师等)的方式专门解决基础问题。在风险分析协会组建一个新的专业小组便是寻求这样一个机会。

相似文献

1
Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management.风险评估与风险管理中的基础问题。
Risk Anal. 2014 Jul;34(7):1164-72. doi: 10.1111/risa.12132. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
2
Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management.风险评估和风险管理中的基本问题。
Risk Anal. 2012 Oct;32(10):1647-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01798.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
3
Some considerations on the definition of risk based on concepts of systems theory and probability.基于系统理论和概率概念对风险定义的一些思考。
Risk Anal. 2014 Jul;34(7):1184-95. doi: 10.1111/risa.12092. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
5
Foundational Challenges for Advancing the Field and Discipline of Risk Analysis.
Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2128-2136. doi: 10.1111/risa.13496. Epub 2020 May 23.
6
International standards and guidelines on education and training for the multi-disciplinary health response to major events that threaten the health status of a community.针对威胁社区健康状况的重大事件的多学科卫生应对措施的教育与培训国际标准和指南。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004 Apr-Jun;19(2):S17-30.
7
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
8
Technology observed: attitudes of a wary public.所观察到的技术:谨慎公众的态度。
Science. 1975 Apr 11;188(4184):121-7. doi: 10.1126/science.188.4184.121.
9
Community health outreach program of the Chad-Cameroon petroleum development and pipeline project.乍得-喀麦隆石油开发与管道项目的社区卫生外展计划。
Clin Occup Environ Med. 2004 Feb;4(1):9-26. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2003.09.004.
10
From Ideal to Real Risk: Philosophy of Causation Meets Risk Analysis.从理想风险到实际风险:因果关系哲学与风险分析的交汇
Risk Anal. 2019 Mar;39(3):729-740. doi: 10.1111/risa.13187. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Lignin Nanoparticles: Transforming Environmental Remediation.木质素纳米颗粒:变革环境修复
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(18):1541. doi: 10.3390/nano14181541.
2
Risk science and politics: What is and should be the relationship?风险科学与政治:现状如何,又应该是怎样的关系?
Risk Anal. 2025 Feb;45(2):274-282. doi: 10.1111/risa.16558. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
Biosafety: From a traditional approach to an integrated approach.生物安全:从传统方法到综合方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;10:956623. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.956623. eCollection 2022.
4
Practical Opportunities to Improve the Impact of Health Risk Assessment on Environmental and Public Health Decisions.改善健康风险评估对环境和公共卫生决策影响的实用机会。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;19(7):4200. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074200.
5
Human Biomonitoring Data in Health Risk Assessments Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals between 2016 and 2021: Confronting Reality after a Preliminary Review.2016 年至 2021 年发表的同行评议期刊中健康风险评估中的人体生物监测数据:初步审查后的现实应对。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 13;19(6):3362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063362.
6
Supporting Occupational Health and Safety Risk Assessment Skills: A Case Study of Five Companies.支持职业健康与安全风险评估技能:五个公司的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;19(3):1720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031720.
7
A Novel Causal Risk-Based Decision-Making Methodology: The Case of Coronavirus.一种新颖的基于因果风险的决策方法:以冠状病毒为例。
Risk Anal. 2021 May;41(5):814-830. doi: 10.1111/risa.13678. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Methodological Challenges in the Economic Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Programmes.职业健康与安全计划经济评估中的方法学挑战
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 21;15(11):2606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112606.
9
Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups.四个利益相关者群体对纳米技术标签的比较分析。
J Nanopart Res. 2015;17(8):327. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-3129-8. Epub 2015 Jul 29.