远程护理能否延长痴呆症患者的社区生活时间?一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案。

Does telecare prolong community living in dementia? A study protocol for a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Leroi Iracema, Woolham John, Gathercole Rebecca, Howard Robert, Dunk Barbara, Fox Chris, O'Brien John, Bateman Andrew, Poland Fiona, Bentham Peter, Burns Alistair, Davies Anna, Forsyth Kirsty, Gray Richard, Knapp Martin, Newman Stanton, McShane Rupert, Ritchie Craig

机构信息

Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, 3rd floor, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2013 Oct 23;14:349. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-349.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assistive technology and telecare (ATT) are relatively new ways of delivering care and support to people with social care needs. It is claimed that ATT reduces the need for community care, prevents unnecessary hospital admission, and delays or prevents admission into residential or nursing care. The current economic situation in England has renewed interest in ATT instead of community care packages. However, at present, the evidence base to support claims about the impact and effectiveness of ATT is limited, despite its potential to mitigate the high financial cost of caring for people with dementia and the social and psychological cost to unpaid carers.

METHOD/DESIGN: ATTILA (Assistive Technology and Telecare to maintain Independent Living At Home for People with Dementia) is a pragmatic, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial over 104 weeks that compares outcomes for people with dementia who receive ATT and those who receive equivalent community services but not ATT. The study hypothesis is that fewer people in the ATT group will go into institutional care over the 4-year period for which the study is funded. The study aims to recruit 500 participants, living in community settings, with dementia or significant cognitive impairment, who have recently been referred to social services.Primary outcome measures are time in days from randomisation to institutionalisation and cost effectiveness. Secondary outcomes are caregiver burden, health-related quality of life in carers, number and severity of serious adverse events, and data on acceptability, applicability and reliability of ATT intervention packages. Assessments will be undertaken in weeks 0 (baseline), 12, 24, 52 and 104 or until institutionalisation or withdrawal of the participant from the trial.

DISCUSSION

In a time of financial austerity, CASSRs in England are increasingly turning to ATT in the belief that it will deliver good outcomes for less money. There is an absence of robust evidence for the cost-effectiveness and benefit of using assistive technology and telecare. The ATTILA trial meets a pressing need for robust, generalisable evidence to either justify continuing investment or reappraise the appropriate scale of ATT use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86537017.

摘要

背景

辅助技术和远程照护(ATT)是为有社会照护需求的人群提供照护和支持的相对较新的方式。据称,ATT减少了社区照护需求,避免了不必要的住院,并延缓或避免了入住寄宿或护理机构。英国当前的经济形势使人们对ATT而非社区照护套餐重新产生了兴趣。然而,目前尽管ATT有潜力减轻照顾痴呆症患者的高昂经济成本以及给无偿照护者带来的社会和心理成本,但支持ATT影响和效果的证据基础仍然有限。

方法/设计:ATTILA(辅助技术和远程照护以维持痴呆症患者在家独立生活)是一项为期104周的务实、多中心随机对照试验,比较接受ATT的痴呆症患者与接受同等社区服务但未接受ATT的患者的结果。研究假设是,在该研究资助的4年期间,ATT组进入机构照护的人数较少。该研究旨在招募500名居住在社区环境中、患有痴呆症或有显著认知障碍且最近被转介至社会服务机构的参与者。主要结局指标是从随机分组到入住机构照护所经历的天数以及成本效益。次要结局包括照护者负担、照护者与健康相关的生活质量、严重不良事件的数量和严重程度,以及ATT干预套餐的可接受性、适用性和可靠性数据。评估将在第0周(基线)、第12周、第24周、第52周和第104周进行,或直至参与者入住机构照护或退出试验。

讨论

在财政紧缩时期,英国的地方当局社会服务审查委员会越来越多地转向ATT,认为它能以更低成本产生良好效果。目前缺乏关于使用辅助技术和远程照护的成本效益和益处的确凿证据。ATTILA试验满足了对有力、可推广证据的迫切需求,以证明是否应继续投资或重新评估ATT的适当使用规模。

试验注册

当前受控试验ISRCTN86537017。

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索