• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节置换患者的医院选择:来自荷兰的实证证据。

Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands.

作者信息

Beukers Puck D C, Kemp Ron G M, Varkevisser Marco

机构信息

Performation Healthcare Intelligence B.V., Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Dec;15(9):927-36. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0535-7. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-013-0535-7
PMID:24158316
Abstract

In the Dutch health care system, hospitals are expected to compete. A necessary condition for competition among hospitals is that patients do not automatically choose the nearest hospital, but are-at least to some extent-sensitive to differences in hospital quality. In this study, an analysis is performed on the underlying features of patient hospital choice in a setting where prices do not matter for patients as a result of health insurance coverage. Using claims data from all Dutch hospitals over the years 2008-2010, a conditional logit model examines the relationship between patient characteristics (age, gender and reoperations) and hospital attributes (hospital quality information, waiting times on treatments and travel time for patients to the hospitals) in the market for general non-emergency hip replacement treatments. The results show that travel time is the most important determinant in patient hospital choice. From our analysis, however, it follows that publicly available hospital quality ratings and waiting times also have a significant impact on patient hospital choice. The panel data used for this study (2008-2010) is rather short, which may explain why no coherent and persistent changes in patient hospital choice behaviour over time are found.

摘要

在荷兰医疗体系中,医院被期望参与竞争。医院间竞争的一个必要条件是患者不会自动选择最近的医院,而是至少在一定程度上对医院质量差异敏感。在本研究中,针对一种因医疗保险覆盖而价格对患者无关紧要的情形,对患者选择医院的潜在特征进行了分析。利用2008年至2010年荷兰所有医院的理赔数据,一个条件logit模型检验了普通非急诊髋关节置换治疗市场中患者特征(年龄、性别和再次手术情况)与医院属性(医院质量信息、治疗等待时间以及患者前往医院的行程时间)之间的关系。结果表明,行程时间是患者选择医院的最重要决定因素。然而,从我们的分析来看,公开可得的医院质量评级和等待时间对患者选择医院也有显著影响。本研究使用的面板数据(2008 - 2010年)相当短,这或许可以解释为何未发现患者选择医院的行为随时间有连贯且持续的变化。

相似文献

1
Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands.髋关节置换患者的医院选择:来自荷兰的实证证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Dec;15(9):927-36. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0535-7. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
2
Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands.患者是否会选择质量评级高的医院?来自荷兰血管成形术市场的经验证据。
J Health Econ. 2012 Mar;31(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
3
Creating compact comparative health care information: what are the key quality attributes to present for cataract and total hip or knee replacement surgery?创建紧凑的比较医疗保健信息:呈现白内障和全髋关节或膝关节置换手术的关键质量属性有哪些?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):287-300. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11415115. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
4
Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands.为什么患者会绕过最近的医院?荷兰骨科护理和神经外科的实证分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Sep;8(3):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0035-0. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
5
Assessing hospital competition when prices don't matter to patients: the use of time-elasticities.在价格对患者无关紧要时评估医院竞争:时间弹性的运用。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010 Mar;10(1):43-60. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9070-6. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
6
Why do not all hip- and knee patients facing long waiting times accept re-referral to hospitals with short waiting time? Questionnaire study.为什么不是所有面临长时间等待的髋关节和膝关节患者都接受再次转诊到等待时间短的医院呢?问卷调查研究。
Health Policy. 2006 Aug;77(3):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
7
The impact of quality on hospital choice. Which information affects patients' behavior for colorectal resection or knee replacement?质量对医院选择的影响。哪些信息会影响患者接受结直肠切除术或膝关节置换术的行为?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2021 Mar;24(1):185-202. doi: 10.1007/s10729-020-09540-2. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Patients', healthcare providers', and insurance company employees' preferences for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a discrete choice experiment.患者、医疗保健提供者和保险公司员工对膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎护理的偏好:离散选择实验。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Oct;28(10):1316-1324. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Choice of hospital: Which type of quality matters?医院的选择:哪种质量至关重要?
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:230-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
10
How do patients trade-off surgeon choice and waiting times for total joint replacement: a discrete choice experiment.患者如何权衡全关节置换术的外科医生选择和等待时间:一项离散选择实验。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Apr;26(4):522-530. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter-regional patient outmigration to Seoul in South Korea: the role of regional healthcare quality perceptions.韩国患者向首尔的跨地区外流:地区医疗质量认知的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12464-8.
2
Challenging selective contracting: reforms for enhancing patient empowerment in healthcare.挑战选择性合同:增强医疗保健中患者赋权的改革措施。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 6;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00673-9.
3
Measuring Active Purchasing in Healthcare: Analysing Reallocations of Funds Between Providers to Evaluate Purchasing Systems Performance in the Netherlands.

本文引用的文献

1
Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands.患者是否会选择质量评级高的医院?来自荷兰血管成形术市场的经验证据。
J Health Econ. 2012 Mar;31(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
2
The effect of waiting time and distance on hospital choice for English cataract patients.等待时间和距离对英国白内障患者选择医院的影响。
Health Econ. 2012 Apr;21(4):444-56. doi: 10.1002/hec.1720. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
3
Effects of report cards on referral patterns to cardiac surgeons.
衡量医疗保健领域的主动采购:分析供应商之间的资金重新分配以评估荷兰采购系统的绩效。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7506. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7506. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
4
Analysis of the current status and influencing factors of cross-regional hospitalization services utilization by basic medical insurance participants in China - taking a central province as an example.中国基本医疗保险参保人员跨区域住院服务利用现状及影响因素分析——以中部某省为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 18;11:1246982. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1246982. eCollection 2023.
5
The elicitation of patient and physician preferences for calculating consumer-based composite measures on hospital report cards: results of two discrete choice experiments.患者和医生对计算医院报告卡上基于消费者的综合指标的偏好的启发:两项离散选择实验的结果。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):1071-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01650-2. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
6
Identifying the Drivers of Inter-Regional Patients' Mobility: An Analysis on Hospital Beds Endowment.识别区域间患者流动的驱动因素:基于医院床位配置的分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 17;11(14):2045. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142045.
7
Policy to expand hospital utilization in disadvantaged areas in Indonesia: who should be the target?印度尼西亚在劣势地区扩大医院利用的政策:谁应该成为目标?
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 3;23(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14656-x.
8
The relationship between internal and external factors about the outpatients' choice of hospital: A cross-sectional study from Jiaxing City, China.门诊患者医院选择的内外因素关系:来自中国嘉兴市的一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 11;5(5):e821. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.821. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study.竞争和捆绑支付对瑞典斯德哥尔摩髋关节置换手术绩效的影响:一项准实验研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 14;12(7):e061077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061077.
10
Analysis of the Characteristics of Cross-Regional Patient Groups and Differences in Hospital Service Utilization in Beijing.北京跨区域患者群体特征及医院服务利用差异分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 9;19(6):3227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063227.
报告卡对心脏外科医生转诊模式的影响。
J Health Econ. 2010 Sep;29(5):718-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
4
Reacting to rankings: evidence from "America's Best Hospitals".对排名的反应:来自“美国最佳医院”的证据。
J Health Econ. 2009 Dec;28(6):1154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
5
Assessing hospital competition when prices don't matter to patients: the use of time-elasticities.在价格对患者无关紧要时评估医院竞争:时间弹性的运用。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010 Mar;10(1):43-60. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9070-6. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
6
Do markets respond to quality information? The case of fertility clinics.市场会对质量信息做出反应吗?生育诊所的案例。
J Health Econ. 2009 May;28(3):718-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
7
Managed competition in the Netherlands: still work-in-progress.荷兰的管理式竞争:仍在进行中。
Health Econ. 2009 Mar;18(3):253-5. doi: 10.1002/hec.1446.
8
Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting.选择最佳医院:公共质量报告的局限性
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1680-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1680.
9
Patient reactions to hospital choice in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden.挪威、丹麦和瑞典患者对医院选择的反应。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Apr;2(Pt 2):125-52. doi: 10.1017/S174413310700401X.
10
Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards.开始传播这一消息:纽约医院报告卡影响的结构估计。
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Mar 15.