Department of Internal Medicine I (Cardiology, Pneumology, Angiology) (A.N., C.K., M.Z., B.B., N.M., P.S.) and Research Center for Bioelectromagnetic Interaction at the Institute of Occupational Medicine; former at the Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine (S.J., D.S., J.S.), University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; and Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands (C.K.).
Circulation. 2014 Jan 28;129(4):441-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003081. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
The number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for the prevention of sudden cardiac death is continuing to increase. Given the technological complexity of ICDs, it is of critical importance to identify and control possible harmful electromagnetic interferences between various sources of electromagnetic fields and ICDs in daily life and occupational environments.
Interference thresholds of 110 ICD patients (1-, 2-, and 3-chamber ICDs) were evaluated in a specifically developed test site. Patients were exposed to single and combined electric and magnetic 50-Hz fields with strengths of up to 30 kV·m⁻¹ and 2.55 mT. Tests were conducted considering worst-case conditions, including maximum sensitivity of the device or full inspiration. With devices being programmed to nominal sensitivity, ICDs remained unaffected in 91 patients (83%). Five of 110 devices (5%) showed transient loss of accurate right ventricular sensing, whereas 14 of 31 (45%) of the 2- and 3-chamber devices displayed impaired right atrial sensing. No interference was detected in 71 patients (65%) within the tested limits with programming to maximum sensitivity, whereas 20 of 110 subjects (18%) exhibited right ventricular disturbances and 19 of 31 (61%) subjects exhibited right atrial disturbances.
Extremely low-frequency daily-life electromagnetic fields do not disturb sensing capabilities of ICDs. However, strong 50-Hz electromagnetic fields, present in certain occupational environments, may cause inappropriate sensing, potentially leading to false detection of atrial/ventricular arrhythmic events. When the right atrial/right ventricular interferences are compared, the atrial lead is more susceptible to electromagnetic fields.
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01626261. Unique identifier: NCT01626261.
用于预防心源性猝死的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)数量持续增加。鉴于 ICD 的技术复杂性,在日常生活和职业环境中识别和控制来自各种电磁源的可能有害电磁干扰对于 ICD 至关重要。
在专门开发的测试地点评估了 110 名 ICD 患者(1、2 和 3 腔 ICD)的干扰阈值。患者暴露于单相和组合的 50 Hz 电场和磁场,强度高达 30 kV·m⁻¹ 和 2.55 mT。测试考虑了最坏情况条件,包括设备的最大灵敏度或完全吸气。在将设备编程为标称灵敏度的情况下,91 名患者(83%)的 ICD 未受影响。在 110 个设备中,有 5 个(5%)设备显示出准确的右心室感知的短暂丢失,而在 2 个和 3 个腔设备中,有 14 个(45%)显示出右心房感知受损。在以最大灵敏度编程的测试范围内,在 71 名患者(65%)中未检测到干扰,而在 110 名患者中有 20 名(18%)患者出现右心室干扰,在 31 名患者中有 19 名(61%)患者出现右心房干扰。
极低频日常生活中的电磁场不会干扰 ICD 的感知能力。然而,某些职业环境中存在的强 50 Hz 电磁场可能会导致不适当的感知,从而可能导致心房/心室心律失常事件的错误检测。当比较右心房/右心室干扰时,心房导联更容易受到电磁场的影响。
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01626261。唯一标识符:NCT01626261。