• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦的电子健康:一个案例研究。

eHealth in Denmark: a case study.

作者信息

Kierkegaard Patrick

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 128, bygning 24, 5. sal, 2300, København S, Denmark,

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2013 Dec;37(6):9991. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-9991-y. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10916-013-9991-y
PMID:24166019
Abstract

Denmark is widely regarded as a leading country in terms of eHealth integration and healthcare delivery services. The push for eHealth adoption over that past 20 years in the Danish health sector has led to the deployment of multiple eHealth technologies. However, in reality the Danish healthcare suffers from eHealth system fragmentation which has led to eHealth's inability to reach full potential in delivering quality healthcare service. This paper will presents a case study of the current state of eHealth in the Danish healthcare system and discuss the current challenges the country is facing today.

摘要

丹麦在电子健康整合和医疗服务提供方面被广泛视为领先国家。在过去20年里,丹麦医疗部门对采用电子健康的推动导致了多种电子健康技术的部署。然而,实际上丹麦医疗保健存在电子健康系统碎片化的问题,这导致电子健康在提供高质量医疗服务方面无法充分发挥潜力。本文将呈现丹麦医疗系统中电子健康现状的案例研究,并讨论该国目前面临的挑战。

相似文献

1
eHealth in Denmark: a case study.丹麦的电子健康:一个案例研究。
J Med Syst. 2013 Dec;37(6):9991. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-9991-y. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
2
Interoperability after deployment: persistent challenges and regional strategies in Denmark.部署后的互操作性:丹麦的持续挑战与区域策略
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Apr;27(2):147-53. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv009. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
3
Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals.建设性电子健康评估:丹麦4家医院电子病历系统开发评估的经验教训
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2.
4
Integrated care needs integrated information management and technology.整合式照护需要整合式信息管理与技术。
Healthc Q. 2009;13 Spec No:24-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.21093.
5
2013 most wired.2013年最具网络连接性。
Hosp Health Netw. 2013 Jul;87(7):26-37.
6
Integrated care: a Danish perspective.整合式照护:丹麦视角
BMJ. 2012 Jul 13;345:e4451. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4451.
7
Information System Maturity Models in Healthcare.医疗保健中的信息系统成熟度模型。
J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 16;42(12):235. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1097-0.
8
Measuring integrated care.衡量整合式照护。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):B4245.
9
HOW FAR TO TRUE INTEROPERABILITY? Efforts ramp up to overcome barriers preventing the exchange of digital health information.距离真正的互操作性还有多远?各方加大努力以克服阻碍数字健康信息交换的障碍。
Health Data Manag. 2015 Apr;23(4):52, 54.
10
Interoperability in Health and Social Care: Organizational Issues are the Biggest Challenge.健康与社会护理中的互操作性:组织问题是最大挑战。
J Innov Health Inform. 2018 Oct 31;25(3):196-198. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v25i3.1024.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolution of healthcare digitalisation policies in Malaysia: A four-decade narrative review (1985-2025).马来西亚医疗数字化政策的演变:四十年叙事性综述(1985 - 2025)
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 2;11:20552076251353279. doi: 10.1177/20552076251353279. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Aortic Root Replacement Procedures: A Validation Study of the Western Denmark Heart Registry from 1999 to 2022.主动脉根部置换手术:1999年至2022年丹麦西部心脏登记处的一项验证研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;15(5):611. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050611.
3
A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of the Complexities of Scaling Up eHealth Innovation.

本文引用的文献

1
Denmark health system review.丹麦医疗体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(2):i-xxii, 1-192.
2
Time intervals from first symptom to treatment of cancer: a cohort study of 2,212 newly diagnosed cancer patients.癌症首次症状到治疗的时间间隔:2212 例新诊断癌症患者的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 25;11:284. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-284.
3
Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? An ecologic study.癌症存活率方面的严重问题是否部分源于守门人原则?一项生态学研究。
扩大电子健康创新复杂性的跨学科分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 2;26:e58007. doi: 10.2196/58007.
4
A 25-Year Retrospective of Health IT Infrastructure Building: The Example of the Catalonia Region.25 年健康信息技术基础设施建设回顾:以加泰罗尼亚地区为例。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 18;26:e58933. doi: 10.2196/58933.
5
Perspective of Health Care Professionals and Cancer Survivors on the Usage of Technology in Consultations.医疗保健专业人员和癌症幸存者对会诊中技术使用的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 2;21(4):430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040430.
6
The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information.保密的生死:患者信息流动的历史分析
Biosocieties. 2023;18(2):282-307. doi: 10.1057/s41292-021-00269-x. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
7
Challenges Faced by Health Professionals in Obtaining Correct Medication Information in the Absence of a Shared Digital Medication List.在缺乏共享数字药物清单的情况下,医疗专业人员获取正确药物信息所面临的挑战。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Feb 22;9(1):46. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010046.
8
Implementation of eHealth and AI integrated diagnostics with multidisciplinary digitized data: are we ready from an international perspective?从国际视角看,我们是否已准备好将电子健康和人工智能集成诊断与多学科数字化数据结合实施?
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5510-5524. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06874-x. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Communicable Disease Surveillance Ethics in the Age of Big Data and New Technology.大数据与新技术时代的传染病监测伦理
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019;11(2):173-187. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00087-1. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Big data in digital healthcare: lessons learnt and recommendations for general practice.数字医疗中的大数据:全科医学的经验教训和建议。
Heredity (Edinb). 2020 Apr;124(4):525-534. doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-0303-2. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Aug;61(589):e508-12. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X588484.
4
Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation.在英国,中等医疗保健中全国性电子健康记录的实施和采用:一项前瞻性全国评估的中期结果的定性分析。
BMJ. 2010 Sep 1;341:c4564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4564.
5
Widespread adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in Denmark: a case study.丹麦基层医疗医生办公室信息技术的广泛应用:一项案例研究。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2010 Mar;80:1-14.
6
Delay in diagnosis: the experience in Denmark.延迟诊断:丹麦的经验。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605383.
7
Building a National Health IT System from the middle out.从中间部分着手构建国家医疗卫生信息技术系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):271-3. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3183.
8
Does a public single payer system deliver integrated care? A national survey study among professional stakeholders in Denmark.公共单一支付者体系能否提供整合照护?丹麦专业利益相关者的全国性调查研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2008 Jul 14;8:e61.
9
Bismarck or Beveridge: a beauty contest between dinosaurs.俾斯麦还是贝弗里奇:恐龙之间的选美比赛。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun 26;7:94. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-94.
10
Missing clinical information: the system is down.临床信息缺失:系统故障。
JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):617-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.617.