• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小切口微透镜取出术中角膜帽厚度的准确性和可重复性。

Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2013 Dec;29(12):810-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20131023-02. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20131023-02
PMID:24168787
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Jena, Germany).

METHODS

Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound (ArcScan Inc., Morrison, CO) measurements were obtained before and 3 months after SMILE in 70 eyes of 37 patients with intended cap thickness between 80 and 140 μm. True cap thickness at the time of creation was calculated as the addition of the preoperative epithelial thickness and the postoperative stromal component of the flap and mapped for the central 5-mm diameter zone. Cap thickness accuracy was calculated as the difference between the mean and intended cap thickness. Reproducibility was evaluated as the cap thickness standard deviation between eyes. Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness were calculated for all eyes and grouped by intended cap thickness. Within-eye variation in cap thickness was calculated as the standard deviation of all data within the central 5-mm diameter zone.

RESULTS

Mean cap thickness accuracy was between -2.3 and 6.5 μm and was -0.7 μm centrally (range: -11 to +14 μm), including all eyes. Cap thickness reproducibility was 6 μm or less for the majority of the central 5-mm diameter zone and was 4.4 μm centrally. Cap thickness accuracy and reproducibility were similar for different intended cap thicknesses. Average within-eye variation in cap thickness was 4.3 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE cap thickness using the VisuMax femtosecond laser was found to be accurate and reproducible across the central 5-mm diameter zone for intended cap thicknesses over the range of 80 to 140 μm.

摘要

目的

评估使用 VisuMax 飞秒激光(德国卡尔蔡司公司)进行小切口角膜微透镜提取(SMILE)时角膜帽厚度的准确性和可重复性。

方法

对 37 例患者的 70 只眼进行了 Artemis 甚高频数字超声(ArcScan 公司,科罗拉多州莫里森)测量,这些患者的预期角膜帽厚度在 80 至 140μm 之间。在创建时的真实角膜帽厚度被计算为术前上皮厚度和瓣的术后基质成分的总和,并绘制中央 5mm 直径区域的地图。角膜帽厚度的准确性计算为平均值与预期角膜帽厚度之间的差异。可重复性作为眼间角膜帽厚度标准差进行评估。根据预期角膜帽厚度对所有眼的准确性和可重复性进行分组。角膜帽厚度的眼内变异性计算为中央 5mm 直径区域内所有数据的标准差。

结果

平均角膜帽厚度的准确性在-2.3 至 6.5μm 之间,中央为-0.7μm(范围:-11 至+14μm),包括所有眼。角膜帽厚度的可重复性在大多数中央 5mm 直径区域为 6μm 或更小,中央为 4.4μm。不同预期角膜帽厚度的角膜帽厚度准确性和可重复性相似。角膜帽厚度的平均眼内变异性为 4.3μm。

结论

在 80 至 140μm 的范围内,使用 VisuMax 飞秒激光进行 SMILE 角膜帽厚度被发现是准确和可重复的,适用于中央 5mm 直径区域。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.小切口微透镜取出术中角膜帽厚度的准确性和可重复性。
J Refract Surg. 2013 Dec;29(12):810-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20131023-02. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
2
Lenticule thickness readout for small incision lenticule extraction compared to artemis three-dimensional very high-frequency digital ultrasound stromal measurements.微切口中的透镜厚度读数与 artemis 三维超高频数字超声基质测量的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 May;30(5):304-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140416-01.
3
Optical Zone Centration Accuracy Using Corneal Fixation-based SMILE Compared to Eye Tracker-based Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.与基于眼动追踪的飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视相比,基于角膜固定的小切口基质透镜切除术的光学区中心定位准确性
J Refract Surg. 2015 Sep;31(9):586-92. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150820-03.
4
Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.卡尔蔡司 Meditec VisuMax 飞秒激光和 MEL 80 准分子激光平台的艺术中央瓣厚度的准确性和可重复性以及 LASIK 的视觉效果。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):107-19. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-06. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
5
Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction.屈光性飞秒激光透镜取出术后中央角膜亚层厚度和生物力学特性。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Feb;30(2):102-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140120-05.
6
Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.应用 VisuMax 飞秒激光行 80μm 和 120μm 角膜瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术的前瞻性对侧眼研究。
J Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;29(7):462-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130617-04.
7
Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures.超过 1500 例小切口微透镜提取手术的安全性和并发症。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Apr;121(4):822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
8
Investigation of predictability and influence factors of the achieved lenticule thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.小切口微透镜切除术的预测性和影响因素的研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01374-4.
9
Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment.近视SMILE术后治疗区中心定位的地形图分析及与飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术的比较:主观与客观对准
J Refract Surg. 2014 Oct;30(10):680-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-04.
10
Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.评估 SMILE 和飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 治疗近视后中央角膜厚度预测值与实际值的差异。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Aug;46(8):1089-1095. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1877310. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction - KLEx.角膜屈光透镜切除术 - KLEx
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2025 Aug;242(8):795-802. doi: 10.1055/a-2650-7508. Epub 2025 Aug 21.
2
[Toric-ICL shows better predictability and efficacy than FS-LASIK for myopia correction in patients with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism].对于中高度近视合并散光患者,散光型有晶体眼人工晶体植入术(Toric-ICL)在近视矫正方面比飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)显示出更好的可预测性和疗效。
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2025 Jun 20;45(6):1113-1121. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.06.01.
3
Effective optical zone following small incision lenticule extraction: a review.
小切口微透镜取出术后的有效光区:综述。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1657-1665. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06263-2. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
4
Evaluation of morphological features: femtosecond-LASIK flap vs. SMILE cap, and the effects on corneal higher-order aberrations.评估形态特征:飞秒 LASIK 瓣与 SMILE 帽,以及对角膜高阶像差的影响。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;260(12):3993-4003. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05841-0. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
Clinical outcomes of the immediate reapplication of small-incision lenticule extraction without adjusting the surgical parameters after suction loss.小切口微透镜取出术后不调整手术参数即刻重新应用,吸力丧失后的临床效果。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 24;12(1):15973. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20403-4.
6
Corneal Lenticule Creation Using a New Solid-State Femtosecond Laser Measured by Spectral Domain OCT in a Porcine Eye Model.新型固态飞秒激光在猪眼模型中经光谱域 OCT 测量的角膜微透镜制作。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Jun 1;11(6):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.6.20.
7
Analytical optimization of the cutting efficiency for generic cavitation bubbles.通用空化气泡切割效率的分析优化
Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Jun 4;12(7):3819-3835. doi: 10.1364/BOE.425895. eCollection 2021 Jul 1.
8
Refractive surgery beyond 2020.2020 年后的屈光手术
Eye (Lond). 2021 Feb;35(2):362-382. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule thickness readout compared to change in axial length measurements with the IOLMaster.小切口微透镜提取术(SMILE)微透镜厚度读数与 IOLMaster 测量眼轴长度变化的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;258(4):917-924. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04529-2. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
10
Cap morphology after small-incision lenticule extraction and its effects on intraocular scattering.小切口透镜切除术术后的晶状体形态及其对眼内散射的影响。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 18;11(3):456-461. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.16. eCollection 2018.