Suppr超能文献

小切口微透镜切除术的预测性和影响因素的研究。

Investigation of predictability and influence factors of the achieved lenticule thickness in small incision lenticule extraction.

机构信息

Eye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jie Fang Road 88#, Hangzhou, 310009, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01374-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the differences between the predicted and achieved lenticule thickness (ΔLT) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery and investigate relationships between ΔLT and predicted lenticule thickness in SMILE.

METHODS

A total of 184 eyes from 184 consecutive patients who underwent SMILE were included in this prospective study. One eye for each patient was randomly selected and included for statistical analysis. To achieve emmetropia, nomogram adds 10% correction of spherical refractive. An ultrasound pachymetry measurement and Scheimpflug camera corneal topography were obtained before and at 3 months after SMILE. The achieved lenticule thickness was calculated by comparing the preoperative examinations with postoperative examinations using ultrasound pachymetry and Pentacam software measurements. The pupil center and corneal vertex were selected as the 2 locations for measurement calculation on Pentacam. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare mean pachymetry values using different instruments. Linear regression analyses were performed between the VisuMax readout lenticule thicknesses and the measured maximum corneal change, between ΔLT and predicted lenticule thickness.

RESULTS

On average, the achieved lenticule thickness measured with ultrasound pachymetry was 13.02 ± 8.87 μm thinner than the predicted lenticule thickness. The proportion of ΔLT in predicted values is 11.9% (ultrasound) and about 15% (Pentacam). Linear regression analysis showed significant relationships between the predicted and each achieved lenticule thickness. Each ΔLT was significantly related to predicted lenticule thickness (ultrasound: R = 0.242; pupil center from Pentacam: R = 0.230).

CONCLUSIONS

An overestimation of achieved lenticule thickness was evident in this study which may exclude eligible SMILE patient. Also, our results showed that 10% increase of spherical refractive correction in the nomogram is appropriate. Furthermore, clinicians should subtract 10% of the predicted lenticule thickness to calculate the residual corneal stroma bed thickness.

摘要

背景

评估小切口角膜基质透镜切除术(SMILE)术后预测的和实际的角膜基质透镜厚度(ΔLT)之间的差异,并探讨SMILE 中 ΔLT 与预测的角膜基质透镜厚度之间的关系。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了 184 例(184 只眼)连续接受 SMILE 手术的患者。每例患者随机选择一只眼进行统计分析。为了实现正视,列矫正表时会增加 10%的球镜屈光矫正。SMILE 术前和术后 3 个月分别行超声角膜测厚和 Scheimpflug 角膜地形图检查。采用超声角膜测厚和 Pentacam 软件测量值比较术前和术后检查,计算实际的角膜基质透镜厚度。在 Pentacam 上,选择瞳孔中心和角膜顶点作为 2 个测量计算位置。采用方差分析(ANOVA)比较不同仪器的平均角膜厚度值。行线性回归分析以评估 VisuMax 读数的角膜基质透镜厚度与最大角膜改变之间的关系,以及 ΔLT 与预测的角膜基质透镜厚度之间的关系。

结果

平均而言,超声角膜测厚测量的实际角膜基质透镜厚度比预测的角膜基质透镜厚度薄 13.02±8.87μm。ΔLT 占预测值的比例约为 11.9%(超声)和 15%(Pentacam)。线性回归分析显示预测和实际角膜基质透镜厚度之间存在显著关系。每个 ΔLT 与预测的角膜基质透镜厚度显著相关(超声:R=0.242;Pentacam 瞳孔中心:R=0.230)。

结论

本研究中,实际角膜基质透镜厚度明显高于预测值,这可能会排除符合 SMILE 手术条件的患者。此外,我们的结果表明,列矫正表时增加 10%的球镜屈光矫正较为合适。此外,临床医生应减去预测角膜基质透镜厚度的 10%来计算剩余的角膜基质床厚度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ff/7079481/c62656f9b5b9/12886_2020_1374_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验