• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡尔蔡司 Meditec VisuMax 飞秒激光和 MEL 80 准分子激光平台的艺术中央瓣厚度的准确性和可重复性以及 LASIK 的视觉效果。

Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.

机构信息

London Vision Clinic, London, UK.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):107-19. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-06. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20100121-06
PMID:20163075
Abstract

PURPOSE

To quantify the accuracy and reproducibility of central flap thickness for flaps created with the VisuMax femtosecond laser system.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 24 eyes of 12 myopic LASIK patients. The VisuMax femtosecond laser was used to create flaps with an intended central flap thickness of 110 microm. Artemis 1 very high-frequency digital ultrasound scans were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Central flap thickness was calculated as the addition of the preoperative epithelial thickness and the postoperative stromal component of the flap. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range) of central Reinstein Flap Thickness were calculated for all flaps. Central flap thickness accuracy was calculated as the difference between the mean and intended flap thickness. Reproducibility was evaluated as the flap thickness standard deviation between eyes.

RESULTS

At 3 months, mean central Reinstein Flap Thickness was 112.3+/-7.9 microm (range: 102.6 to 132.9 microm). The accuracy was +2.3 microm and reproducibility was 7.9 microm. On average, the flap diameter was 0.47+/-0.21 mm greater than the intended flap diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

The VisuMax femtosecond laser system was found to create flaps accurate to the intended thickness in the center with a low standard deviation, which will help reduce the risk of obtaining an excessively thick flap.

摘要

目的

定量评估 VisuMax 飞秒激光系统制作的角膜瓣中央厚度的准确性和可重复性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 12 例(24 只眼)接受近视 LASIK 手术的患者。采用 VisuMax 飞秒激光制作中央厚度预期为 110μm 的角膜瓣。术前及术后 3 个月采用 Artemis 1 超高频数字超声扫描系统进行检查。中央角膜瓣厚度定义为术前上皮层厚度与术后角膜瓣基质层厚度之和。对所有角膜瓣的中央 Reinstein 瓣厚度(单位:微米)进行描述性统计分析(平均值、标准差、最小值、最大值和范围)。中央角膜瓣厚度的准确性定义为平均厚度与预期厚度的差值。可重复性定义为双眼之间角膜瓣厚度的标准差。

结果

术后 3 个月,平均中央 Reinstein 瓣厚度为 112.3±7.9μm(范围:102.6μm 至 132.9μm)。准确性为+2.3μm,可重复性为 7.9μm。平均而言,角膜瓣直径比预期直径大 0.47±0.21mm。

结论

VisuMax 飞秒激光系统制作的角膜瓣中央厚度准确,且标准差较低,这有助于降低获得过厚角膜瓣的风险。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and reproducibility of artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms.卡尔蔡司 Meditec VisuMax 飞秒激光和 MEL 80 准分子激光平台的艺术中央瓣厚度的准确性和可重复性以及 LASIK 的视觉效果。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):107-19. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-06. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
2
Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.应用 VisuMax 飞秒激光行 80μm 和 120μm 角膜瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术的前瞻性对侧眼研究。
J Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;29(7):462-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130617-04.
3
Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.飞秒激光和微型角膜刀制作的角膜瓣的角膜结构,通过眼前节光学相干断层扫描成像。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.013.
4
Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.比较薄瓣和超薄瓣的 LASEK 和 LASIK 与准分子激光消融的 SCHWIND 非球面消融轮廓。
J Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;27(1):38-48. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100406-01. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
5
Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 2 femtosecond lasers.两种飞秒激光制作的准分子原位角膜磨镶术瓣的比较。
Cornea. 2015 Mar;34(3):328-33. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000361.
6
A prospective randomized comparison of four femtosecond LASIK flap thicknesses.四种飞秒 LASIK 角膜瓣厚度的前瞻性随机比较。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;26(6):392-402. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090728-02. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
7
Efficacy, safety, and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratomileusis.新飞秒激光在准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中的疗效、安全性和瓣尺寸。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Mar;36(3):442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.030.
8
Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.应用 200kHz 飞秒激光行 LASIK 术中角膜瓣厚度的可预测性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Mar;39(3):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.041. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.准分子原位角膜磨镶术增效术中的瓣和基质床厚度
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Nov;30(11):2295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.080.
10
Predictive factors of femtosecond laser flap thickness measured by online optical coherence pachymetry subtraction in sub-Bowman keratomileusis.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术中在线光学相干测厚法测量飞秒激光瓣厚度的预测因素
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;34(11):1872-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical safety and efficacy of elliptical thin-flap LASIK using a low-pulse energy femtosecond laser.采用低能量飞秒激光的椭圆薄瓣 LASIK 的临床安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 19;14(1):24563. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76215-1.
2
Assessment of Changes in Cap and Residual Stromal Thickness Values during a 6-Month Observation after Refractive Lenticule Extraction Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.屈光性晶状体微切口摘除术后6个月观察期内帽状和残余基质厚度值变化的评估 小切口晶状体微切口摘除术
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 8;13(7):2148. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072148.
3
Principles of Ophthalmic Ultrasound.
眼科超声原理
Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2023;18(6):379-389. doi: 10.1080/17469899.2023.2277781. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
4
Top 50 most-cited articles on SMILE surgery between 2010 and 2022: a correlation comparison between conventional bibliometrics and current altmetrics of research impact.2010 年至 2022 年间发表的关于 SMILE 手术的前 50 篇最具引用价值的文章:传统文献计量学与当前研究影响力的替代计量学之间的相关性比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;43(7):2521-2532. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02652-y. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
5
Analytical optimization of the cutting efficiency for generic cavitation bubbles.通用空化气泡切割效率的分析优化
Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Jun 4;12(7):3819-3835. doi: 10.1364/BOE.425895. eCollection 2021 Jul 1.
6
One-Year Visual and Refractive Outcomes following LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism with MEL 90 versus Schwind Amaris 750S Excimer Laser: A Comparative Study.使用MEL 90与Schwind Amaris 750S准分子激光进行LASIK治疗近视和近视散光的一年视力和屈光结果:一项比较研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 25;2021:9929181. doi: 10.1155/2021/9929181. eCollection 2021.
7
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule thickness readout compared to change in axial length measurements with the IOLMaster.小切口微透镜提取术(SMILE)微透镜厚度读数与 IOLMaster 测量眼轴长度变化的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;258(4):917-924. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04529-2. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
History and Results; Indications and Contraindications of SMILE Compared With LASIK.历史和结果;SMILE 与 LASIK 相比的适应证和禁忌证。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):371-376. doi: 10.1097/01.APO.0000580132.98159.fa.
9
Future Developments in SMILE: Higher Degree of Myopia and Hyperopia.SMILE 技术的未来发展:更高程度的近视和远视。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):412-416. doi: 10.1097/01.APO.0000580128.27272.bb.
10
High incidence of rainbow glare after femtosecond laser assisted-LASIK using the upgraded FS200 femtosecond laser.使用升级版FS200飞秒激光的飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术后彩虹眩光的高发生率。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 5;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0734-1.