Roberts Andrew, Devos Yann, Raybould Alan, Bigelow Patrick, Gray Alan
Center for Environmental Risk Assessment, ILSI Research Foundation, Washington, DC, USA,
Transgenic Res. 2014 Dec;23(6):971-83. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9762-z. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
The requirement for environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically engineered (GE) plants prior to large scale or commercial introduction into the environment is well established in national laws and regulations, as well as in international agreements. Since the first introductions of GE plants in commercial agriculture in the 1990s, a nearly universal paradigm has emerged for conducting these assessments based on a few guiding principles. These include the concept of case-by-case assessment, the use of comparative assessments, and a focus of the ERA on characteristics of the plant, the introduced trait, and the receiving environment as well as the intended use. In practice, however, ERAs for GE plants have frequently focused on achieving highly detailed characterizations of potential hazards at the expense of consideration of the relevant levels of exposure. This emphasis on exhaustive hazard characterization can lead to great difficulties when applied to ERA for GE plants under low-exposure conditions. This paper presents some relevant considerations for conducting an ERA for a GE plant in a low-exposure scenario in the context of the generalized ERA paradigm, building on discussions and case studies presented during a session at ISBGMO 12.
在大规模或商业性引入环境之前,对转基因植物进行环境风险评估(ERA)的要求已在国家法律法规以及国际协定中得到充分确立。自20世纪90年代转基因植物首次被引入商业农业以来,基于一些指导原则,已出现一种几乎通用的进行这些评估的范式。这些原则包括逐案评估的概念、比较评估的运用,以及环境风险评估关注植物的特性、导入的性状、受体环境以及预期用途。然而,在实践中,转基因植物的环境风险评估常常侧重于对潜在危害进行高度详细的描述,而忽视了对相关暴露水平的考量。当应用于低暴露条件下转基因植物的环境风险评估时,这种对详尽危害描述的强调可能会导致巨大困难。本文基于在国际生物安全大会第12届会议期间的讨论和案例研究,在广义环境风险评估范式的背景下,提出了在低暴露情景下对转基因植物进行环境风险评估的一些相关考量。