Department of Health Sciences, Italian University of Sport and Movement of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 15, Rome 00196, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Oct 31;10(11):5683-96. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115683.
The aim of the study was to determine which kind of physical activity could be useful to inmate populations to improve their health status and fitness levels. A repeated measure design was used to evaluate the effects of two different training protocols on subjects in a state of detention, tested pre- and post-experimental protocol.Seventy-five male subjects were enrolled in the studyand randomly allocated to three groups: the cardiovascular plus resistance training protocol group (CRT) (n = 25; mean age 30.9 ± 8.9 years),the high-intensity strength training protocol group (HIST) (n = 25; mean age 33.9 ± 6.8 years), and a control group (C) (n = 25; mean age 32.9 ± 8.9 years) receiving no treatment. All subjects underwent a clinical assessmentandfitness tests. MANOVA revealed significant multivariate effects on group (p < 0.01) and group-training interaction (p < 0.05). CRT protocol resulted the most effective protocol to reach the best outcome in fitness tests. Both CRT and HIST protocols produced significant gains in the functional capacity (cardio-respiratory capacity and cardiovascular disease risk decrease) of incarcerated males. The significant gains obtained in functional capacity reflect the great potential of supervised exercise interventions for improving the health status of incarcerated people.
本研究旨在确定哪种体育活动对被监禁人群有益,可以改善他们的健康状况和体能水平。采用重复测量设计来评估两种不同训练方案对被拘留人员的影响,在实验前后进行测试。研究共纳入 75 名男性被试,随机分为三组:心血管加抗阻训练方案组(CRT)(n = 25;平均年龄 30.9 ± 8.9 岁)、高强度力量训练方案组(HIST)(n = 25;平均年龄 33.9 ± 6.8 岁)和对照组(C)(n = 25;平均年龄 32.9 ± 8.9 岁),不接受任何治疗。所有被试都进行了临床评估和体能测试。多变量方差分析显示,组间(p < 0.01)和组-训练交互作用(p < 0.05)存在显著的多变量效应。CRT 方案是在体能测试中达到最佳效果的最有效方案。CRT 和 HIST 方案都显著提高了被监禁男性的功能能力(心肺功能和心血管疾病风险降低)。功能能力的显著提高反映了监督锻炼干预对改善被监禁人群健康状况的巨大潜力。