Sanguinetti A, Docimo G, Ragusa M, Calzolari F, D'Ajello F, Ruggiero R, Parmeggiani D, Pezzolla A, Procaccini E, Avenia N
Department of Surgery, University of Perugia, Italy.
G Chir. 2010 Apr;31(4):151-3.
The ultrasound scissors are recently emerging as an alternative surgical tool for dissection and haemostasis and have been extensively used in the field of minimally invasive surgery. We studied the utility and advantages of this instrument compared with electrocautery to perform axillary dissection. The operative and morbidity details of thirty-five breast cancer patients who underwent axillary dissection using the ultrasound scissors were compared with 35 matched controls operated with electrocautery by the same surgical team. There was no significant difference in the operating time between the ultrasound scissors and electrocautery group (36 and 30 mins, p>0.05). The blood loss (60 +/- 35 ml and 294 +/- 155 ml, p<0.001) and drainage volume (200 +/- 130 ml and 450 +/- 230 ml, p<0.001) were significantly lower in the ultrasound scissors group. There was a significant reduction of draining days in ultrasound scissors group (mean one and four days, respectively p<0.05). There was significant difference in the seroma rate between the two groups (10% and 30%, respectively). Axillary dissection using harmonic scalpel is feasible and the learning curve is short. Ultrasound scissor significantly reduces the blood loss and duration of drainage as compared to electrocautery.
超声剪刀作为一种用于解剖和止血的新型手术工具,近年来正在兴起,并已在微创手术领域得到广泛应用。我们研究了与电灼术相比,该器械在进行腋窝清扫术中的效用和优势。将35例使用超声剪刀进行腋窝清扫术的乳腺癌患者的手术及发病情况细节,与由同一手术团队使用电灼术操作的35例匹配对照患者进行比较。超声剪刀组和电灼术组的手术时间无显著差异(分别为36分钟和30分钟,p>0.05)。超声剪刀组的失血量(60±35毫升和294±155毫升,p<0.001)和引流量(200±130毫升和450±230毫升,p<0.001)显著更低。超声剪刀组的引流天数显著减少(分别为平均1天和4天,p<0.05)。两组之间的血清肿发生率存在显著差异(分别为10%和30%)。使用超声刀进行腋窝清扫术是可行的,且学习曲线较短。与电灼术相比,超声剪刀显著减少了失血量和引流时间。