• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤稿处罚:来自科学网的证据。

The retraction penalty: evidence from the Web of Science.

作者信息

Lu Susan Feng, Jin Ginger Zhe, Uzzi Brian, Jones Benjamin

机构信息

Simon School of Business, University of Rochester.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 6;3:3146. doi: 10.1038/srep03146.

DOI:10.1038/srep03146
PMID:24192909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3818648/
Abstract

Scientific articles are retracted at increasing rates, with the highest rates among top journals. Here we show that a single retraction triggers citation losses through an author's prior body of work. Compared to closely-matched control papers, citations fall by an average of 6.9% per year for each prior publication. These chain reactions are sustained on authors' papers (a) published up to a decade earlier and (b) connected within the authors' own citation network by up to 4 degrees of separation from the retracted publication. Importantly, however, citation losses among prior work disappear when authors self-report the error. Our analyses and results span the range of scientific disciplines.

摘要

科学文章的撤稿率在不断上升,顶级期刊中的撤稿率最高。我们在此表明,一次撤稿会通过作者先前的作品引发引用量的损失。与匹配度高的对照论文相比,每篇先前发表的论文的引用量平均每年下降6.9%。这些连锁反应在作者(a)早至十年前发表的论文以及(b)在作者自己的引用网络中与撤稿论文的分离度高达4度的论文上持续存在。然而,重要的是,当作者自行报告错误时,先前作品的引用量损失就会消失。我们的分析和结果涵盖了各个科学学科。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/d2aeb983767b/srep03146-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/430ec837383e/srep03146-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/8dab2b9af1df/srep03146-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/3496af164418/srep03146-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/d2aeb983767b/srep03146-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/430ec837383e/srep03146-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/8dab2b9af1df/srep03146-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/3496af164418/srep03146-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89cd/3818648/d2aeb983767b/srep03146-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
The retraction penalty: evidence from the Web of Science.撤稿处罚:来自科学网的证据。
Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 6;3:3146. doi: 10.1038/srep03146.
2
The unfortunately long life of some retracted biomedical research publications.一些被撤回的生物医学研究出版物不幸的漫长寿命。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 May 1;128(5):1381-1391. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
3
Retracted Publications Within Radiology Journals.被撤回的放射学期刊出版物。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Feb;206(2):231-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15163.
4
Retraction of publications in nursing and midwifery research: A systematic review.撤回护理和助产学研究中的出版物:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 May;81:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.013. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations.科学中的自我纠错:撤回对引用频率的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0277814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277814. eCollection 2022.
6
Retractions in Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences Journals: A Systematic Review.康复与运动科学期刊中的撤稿:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov;101(11):1980-1990. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 10.
7
A survey of retracted articles in dentistry.一项关于牙科领域撤稿文章的调查。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 6;10(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2576-y.
8
Improved citation status of World Journal Gastroenterology in 2004: Analysis of all reference citations by WJG and citations of WJG articles by other SCI journals during 1998-2004.《世界胃肠病学杂志》2004年被引情况改善:对1998 - 2004年期间《世界胃肠病学杂志》的所有参考文献引用情况以及其他SCI期刊对《世界胃肠病学杂志》文章的引用情况分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan 7;11(1):1-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i1.1.
9
Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem.撤回出版物的引用:一个具有挑战性的问题。
Account Res. 2022 Jan;29(1):18-25. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1886933. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
10
Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview.与伪造同行评审相关的撤稿特征概述
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Aug;93(1102):499-503. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-133969. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Can I trust this paper?我能信任这篇论文吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02740-3.
2
The pivot penalty in research.研究中的关键处罚。
Nature. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1.
3
Reflections on Advocacy as a Foundation of Global Health Law.关于倡导作为全球卫生法基础的思考

本文引用的文献

1
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.不当行为导致了大多数被撤回的科学出版物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
2
The effectiveness of the practice of correction and republication in the biomedical literature.校正后重新发表在生物医学文献中的实践的有效性。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Apr;98(2):135-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.2.005.
3
How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited.
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):59. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.9. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
4
Citation penalties following sexual versus scientific misconduct allegations.性不当行为指控与科学不当行为指控后的引用处罚。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0317736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317736. eCollection 2025.
5
Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science.科学文献中的撤稿文章:2003年至2022年使用Web of Science进行的文献计量分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 26;10(20):e38620. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
6
A systematic review of ENT retractions.耳鼻喉科手术牵拉的系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):1041-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08980-8. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
7
Concerning trends and potential issues in osteosarcoma research publication.关于骨肉瘤研究出版物的趋势和潜在问题。
Cancer Sci. 2024 Oct;115(10):3483-3485. doi: 10.1111/cas.16303. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
8
The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses.方法学质量与证据综合中使用撤回文献之间的关系。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 20;12(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02316-z.
9
Reply to Crocket et al. and Mottelson and Kontogiorgos: Machine Learning's scientific significance and future impact on replicability research.对克罗克特等人以及莫特尔森和孔托吉奥戈斯的回应:机器学习对可重复性研究的科学意义及未来影响
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 15;120(33):e2308195120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2308195120. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
10
Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science.科学学中的数据、度量和经验方法。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1046-1058. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01562-4. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
科学文献清除欺诈性材料需要多长时间?:重新审视布鲁宁案例。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):843-7. doi: 10.1185/03007991003603804.
4
Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct.科学不端行为影响下的生物医学文章被引分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Jun;16(2):251-61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9151-4. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
5
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据?对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
6
Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine.医学论文撤稿对引用及实践的影响。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Oct;87(4):437-43.
7
Phenomena of retraction: reasons for retraction and citations to the publications.撤稿现象:撤稿原因及对相关出版物的引用情况
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):296-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.296.
8
The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature.继续使用已撤回的、无效的科学文献。
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1420-3.