• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自主节奏和斜坡递增运动测试方案的血液动力学和代谢反应。

Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to self-paced and ramp-graded exercise testing protocols.

机构信息

a Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA.

b Department of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Jun;43(6):609-616. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0608. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1139/apnm-2017-0608
PMID:29334615
Abstract

Recent examinations have shown lower maximal oxygen consumption during traditional ramp (RAMP) compared with self-paced (SPV) graded exercise testing (GXT) attributed to differences in cardiac output. The current study examined the differences in hemodynamic and metabolic responses between RAMP and SPV during treadmill exercise. Sixteen recreationally trained men (aged23.7 ± 3.0 years) completed 2 separate treadmill GXT protocols. SPV consisted of five 2-min stages (10 min total) of increasing speed clamped by the Borg RPE6-20 scale. RAMP increased speed by 0.16 km/h every 15 s until volitional exhaustion. All testing was performed at 3% incline. Oxygen consumption was measured via indirect calorimetry; hemodynamic function was measured via thoracic impedance and blood lactate (BLa) was measured via portable lactate analyzer. Differences between SPV and RAMP protocols were analyzed as group means by using paired-samples t tests (R Core Team 2017). Maximal values for SPV and RAMP were similar (p > 0.05) for oxygen uptake (47.1 ± 3.4 vs. 47.4 ± 3.4 mL·kg·min), heart rate (198 ± 5 vs. 200 ± 6 beats·min), ventilation (158.8 ± 20.7 vs. 159.3 ± 19.0 L·min), cardiac output (26.9 ± 5.5 vs. 27.9 ± 4.2 L·min), stroke volume (SV) (145.9 ± 29.2 vs. 149.8 ± 25.3 mL·beat), arteriovenous oxygen difference (18.5 ± 3.1 vs. 19.7 ± 3.1 mL·dL), ventilatory threshold (VT) (78.2 ± 7.2 vs. 79.0% ± 7.6%), and peak BLa (11.7 ± 2.3 vs. 11.5 ± 2.4 mmol·L), respectively. In conclusion, SPV elicits similar maximal hemodynamic responses in comparison to RAMP; however, SV kinetics exhibited unique characteristics based on protocol. These results support SPV as a feasible GXT protocol to identify useful fitness parameters (maximal oxygen uptake, oxygen uptake kinetics, and VT).

摘要

最近的研究表明,在传统 ramp(RAMP)与自我调节(SPV)分级运动测试(GXT)中,由于心输出量的差异,传统 ramp 时的最大耗氧量较低。本研究旨在探讨在跑步机运动中 RAMP 和 SPV 之间血流动力学和代谢反应的差异。16 名有经验的男性(年龄 23.7±3.0 岁)完成了 2 项单独的跑步机 GXT 方案。SPV 由 Borg RPE6-20 量表标定的 5 个 2 分钟阶段(共 10 分钟)组成,速度逐渐增加。RAMP 以每 15 秒 0.16km/h 的速度增加,直到自愿衰竭。所有测试均在 3%的坡度上进行。通过间接热量法测量耗氧量;通过胸阻抗法测量血流动力学功能;通过便携式乳酸分析仪测量血乳酸(BLa)。使用配对样本 t 检验(R Core Team 2017)分析 SPV 和 RAMP 方案之间的差异作为组平均值。SPV 和 RAMP 的最大值相似(p>0.05),包括摄氧量(47.1±3.4 vs.47.4±3.4mL·kg·min)、心率(198±5 vs.200±6 beats·min)、通气量(158.8±20.7 vs.159.3±19.0L·min)、心输出量(26.9±5.5 vs.27.9±4.2L·min)、每搏量(SV)(145.9±29.2 vs.149.8±25.3mL·beat)、动静脉氧差(18.5±3.1 vs.19.7±3.1mL·dL)、通气阈(VT)(78.2±7.2 vs.79.0%±7.6%)和峰值 BLa(11.7±2.3 vs.11.5±2.4mmol·L)。总之,SPV 与 RAMP 相比,诱发的最大血流动力学反应相似;然而,根据方案,SV 动力学表现出独特的特征。这些结果支持 SPV 作为一种可行的 GXT 方案,用于确定有用的健康参数(最大摄氧量、摄氧量动力学和 VT)。

相似文献

1
Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to self-paced and ramp-graded exercise testing protocols.自主节奏和斜坡递增运动测试方案的血液动力学和代谢反应。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Jun;43(6):609-616. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0608. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Increased cardiac output elicits higher V̇O2max in response to self-paced exercise.心输出量增加会引发在自定步速运动时更高的最大摄氧量。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Mar;40(3):223-9. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0305. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
3
The efficacy of a self-paced VO2max test during motorized treadmill exercise.在电动跑步机运动中进行自我调节最大摄氧量测试的效果。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Jan;10(1):99-105. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0052. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
Age differences in physiological responses to self-paced and incremental [Formula: see text] testing.不同年龄段对自我调节和递增负荷测试的生理反应差异。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jan;117(1):159-170. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3508-6. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
5
The self-paced VO2max test to assess maximal oxygen uptake in highly trained runners.用于评估高水平跑步运动员最大摄氧量的自定步速最大摄氧量测试。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Mar;10(2):172-7. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0041. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
6
The efficacy of the self-paced V̇O2max test to measure maximal oxygen uptake in treadmill running.自定步速的最大摄氧量测试在测量跑步机跑步中最大摄氧量方面的功效。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Dec;38(12):1211-6. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0384. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
A new VO₂max protocol allowing self-pacing in maximal incremental exercise.一种新的最大摄氧量(VO₂max)方案,允许在最大递增运动中自我调节节奏。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;46(1):59-63. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090006. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
8
The Decremental Protocol as an Alternative Protocol to Measure Maximal Oxygen Consumption in Athletes.递减式方案作为测量运动员最大摄氧量的替代方案。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Nov;11(8):1094-1099. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0488. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
9
Estimating Hemodynamic Responses to the Wingate Test Using Thoracic Impedance.使用胸阻抗法评估对温盖特测试的血流动力学反应。
J Sports Sci Med. 2015 Nov 24;14(4):834-40. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
VO2max Measured with a Self-selected Work Rate Protocol on an Automated Treadmill.最大摄氧量的自我选择工作速率方案在自动跑步机上测量。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Oct;47(10):2158-65. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000647.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation of VO2max prediction models based on recreational and elite endurance athletes.基于业余和精英耐力运动员的最大摄氧量预测模型的外部验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0280897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280897. eCollection 2023.
2
Is a verification phase useful for confirming maximal oxygen uptake in apparently healthy adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.验证阶段对于确认明显健康的成年人的最大摄氧量是否有用?系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0247057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247057. eCollection 2021.
3
Metabolic effects of two high-intensity circuit training protocols: Does sequence matter?
两种高强度循环训练方案的代谢效应:顺序重要吗?
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2020 Jan;18(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Nonparametric dynamical model of cardiorespiratory responses at the onset and offset of treadmill exercises.在跑步机运动开始和结束时的心肺反应的非参数动力学模型。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 Dec;56(12):2337-2351. doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1860-x. Epub 2018 Jun 28.