Suppr超能文献

自主节奏和斜坡递增运动测试方案的血液动力学和代谢反应。

Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to self-paced and ramp-graded exercise testing protocols.

机构信息

a Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA.

b Department of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Jun;43(6):609-616. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0608. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

Abstract

Recent examinations have shown lower maximal oxygen consumption during traditional ramp (RAMP) compared with self-paced (SPV) graded exercise testing (GXT) attributed to differences in cardiac output. The current study examined the differences in hemodynamic and metabolic responses between RAMP and SPV during treadmill exercise. Sixteen recreationally trained men (aged23.7 ± 3.0 years) completed 2 separate treadmill GXT protocols. SPV consisted of five 2-min stages (10 min total) of increasing speed clamped by the Borg RPE6-20 scale. RAMP increased speed by 0.16 km/h every 15 s until volitional exhaustion. All testing was performed at 3% incline. Oxygen consumption was measured via indirect calorimetry; hemodynamic function was measured via thoracic impedance and blood lactate (BLa) was measured via portable lactate analyzer. Differences between SPV and RAMP protocols were analyzed as group means by using paired-samples t tests (R Core Team 2017). Maximal values for SPV and RAMP were similar (p > 0.05) for oxygen uptake (47.1 ± 3.4 vs. 47.4 ± 3.4 mL·kg·min), heart rate (198 ± 5 vs. 200 ± 6 beats·min), ventilation (158.8 ± 20.7 vs. 159.3 ± 19.0 L·min), cardiac output (26.9 ± 5.5 vs. 27.9 ± 4.2 L·min), stroke volume (SV) (145.9 ± 29.2 vs. 149.8 ± 25.3 mL·beat), arteriovenous oxygen difference (18.5 ± 3.1 vs. 19.7 ± 3.1 mL·dL), ventilatory threshold (VT) (78.2 ± 7.2 vs. 79.0% ± 7.6%), and peak BLa (11.7 ± 2.3 vs. 11.5 ± 2.4 mmol·L), respectively. In conclusion, SPV elicits similar maximal hemodynamic responses in comparison to RAMP; however, SV kinetics exhibited unique characteristics based on protocol. These results support SPV as a feasible GXT protocol to identify useful fitness parameters (maximal oxygen uptake, oxygen uptake kinetics, and VT).

摘要

最近的研究表明,在传统 ramp(RAMP)与自我调节(SPV)分级运动测试(GXT)中,由于心输出量的差异,传统 ramp 时的最大耗氧量较低。本研究旨在探讨在跑步机运动中 RAMP 和 SPV 之间血流动力学和代谢反应的差异。16 名有经验的男性(年龄 23.7±3.0 岁)完成了 2 项单独的跑步机 GXT 方案。SPV 由 Borg RPE6-20 量表标定的 5 个 2 分钟阶段(共 10 分钟)组成,速度逐渐增加。RAMP 以每 15 秒 0.16km/h 的速度增加,直到自愿衰竭。所有测试均在 3%的坡度上进行。通过间接热量法测量耗氧量;通过胸阻抗法测量血流动力学功能;通过便携式乳酸分析仪测量血乳酸(BLa)。使用配对样本 t 检验(R Core Team 2017)分析 SPV 和 RAMP 方案之间的差异作为组平均值。SPV 和 RAMP 的最大值相似(p>0.05),包括摄氧量(47.1±3.4 vs.47.4±3.4mL·kg·min)、心率(198±5 vs.200±6 beats·min)、通气量(158.8±20.7 vs.159.3±19.0L·min)、心输出量(26.9±5.5 vs.27.9±4.2L·min)、每搏量(SV)(145.9±29.2 vs.149.8±25.3mL·beat)、动静脉氧差(18.5±3.1 vs.19.7±3.1mL·dL)、通气阈(VT)(78.2±7.2 vs.79.0%±7.6%)和峰值 BLa(11.7±2.3 vs.11.5±2.4mmol·L)。总之,SPV 与 RAMP 相比,诱发的最大血流动力学反应相似;然而,根据方案,SV 动力学表现出独特的特征。这些结果支持 SPV 作为一种可行的 GXT 方案,用于确定有用的健康参数(最大摄氧量、摄氧量动力学和 VT)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验