Suppr超能文献

用于评估高水平跑步运动员最大摄氧量的自定步速最大摄氧量测试。

The self-paced VO2max test to assess maximal oxygen uptake in highly trained runners.

作者信息

Hogg James S, Hopker James G, Mauger Alexis R

机构信息

School of Sport & Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Chatham, UK.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Mar;10(2):172-7. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0041. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The novel self-paced maximal-oxygen-uptake (VO2max) test (SPV) may be a more suitable alternative to traditional maximal tests for elite athletes due to the ability to self-regulate pace. This study aimed to examine whether the SPV can be administered on a motorized treadmill.

METHODS

Fourteen highly trained male distance runners performed a standard graded exercise test (GXT), an incline-based SPV (SPVincline), and a speed-based SPV (SPVspeed). The GXT included a plateau-verification stage. Both SPV protocols included 5×2-min stages (and a plateau-verification stage) and allowed for self-pacing based on fixed increments of rating of perceived exertion: 11, 13, 15, 17, and 20. The participants varied their speed and incline on the treadmill by moving between different marked zones in which the tester would then adjust the intensity.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference (P=.319, ES=0.21) in the VO2max achieved in the SPVspeed (67.6±3.6 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), 95%CI=65.6-69.7 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)) compared with that achieved in the GXT (68.6±6.0 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), 95%CI=65.1-72.1 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)). Participants achieved a significantly higher VO2max in the SPVincline (70.6±4.3 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1), 95%CI=68.1-73.0 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)) than in either the GXT (P=.027, ES=0.39) or SPVspeed (P=.001, ES=0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

The SPVspeed protocol produces VO2max values similar to those obtained in the GXT and may represent a more appropriate and athlete-friendly test that is more oriented toward the variable speed found in competitive sport.

摘要

目的

新型的自定步速最大摄氧量(VO₂max)测试(SPV)对于精英运动员而言,可能是传统最大测试的更合适替代方案,因为它具备自我调节步速的能力。本研究旨在探讨SPV是否可以在电动跑步机上进行。

方法

14名训练有素的男性长跑运动员进行了标准分级运动测试(GXT)、基于坡度的SPV(SPVincline)和基于速度的SPV(SPVspeed)。GXT包括一个平台验证阶段。两种SPV方案均包括5个2分钟阶段(以及一个平台验证阶段),并允许根据主观用力程度的固定增量进行自定步速:11、13、15、17和20。参与者通过在不同的标记区域之间移动来改变跑步机上的速度和坡度,测试人员随后会在这些区域调整强度。

结果

与GXT(68.6±6.0 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,95%CI = 65.1 - 72.1 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)相比,SPVspeed(67.6±3.6 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,95%CI = 65.6 - 69.7 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)所测得的VO₂max无显著差异(P = 0.319,ES = 0.21)。参与者在SPVincline中测得的VO₂max(70.6±4.3 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,95%CI = 68.1 - 73.0 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹)显著高于GXT(P = 0.027,ES = 0.39)或SPVspeed(P = 0.001,ES = 0.76)。

结论

SPVspeed方案所产生的VO₂max值与GXT中获得的值相似,可能代表了一种更合适且对运动员更友好的测试,更符合竞技运动中发现的可变速度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验