Mellado Ana, Zamora Regino
Department of Ecology, Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, University of Granada, Av. Fuentenueva s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain,
Oecologia. 2014 Sep;176(1):139-47. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3013-8. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
Mistletoes constitute instructive study cases with which to address the role of generalist consumers in the study of plant-animal interactions. Their ranges of safe sites for recruitment are among the most restricted of any plant; therefore, frugivores specializing in mistletoe have been considered almost indispensable for the seed dispersal of these parasitic plants. However, the absence of such specialists in numerous regions inhabited by many mistletoe species raises the question of whether unspecialized vectors may successfully disperse mistletoe seeds to narrowly defined safe sites. Using the European mistletoe Viscum album subsp. austriacum as a study case, we recorded a broad range of 11 bird species that disperse mistletoe seeds. For these species, we studied the mistletoe-visitation rate and feeding behavior to estimate the quantity component of dispersal effectiveness, and the post-foraging microhabitat use, seed handling, and recruitment probabilities of different microhabitats as a measure of the quality component of effectiveness. Both endozoochory and ectozoochory are valid dispersal mechanisms, as the seeds do not need to be ingested to germinate, increasing seed-dispersal versatility. Thrushes were the most effective dispersers, although they were rather inefficient, whereas small birds (both frugivores and non-frugivores) offered low-quantity but high-quality services for depositing seeds directly upon safe sites. As birds behave similarly on parasitized and non-parasitized hosts, and vectors have broad home ranges, reinfection within patches and the colonization of new patches are ensured by an ample assemblage of generalist birds. Thus, a parasitic plant requiring precision in seed dispersal can rely on unspecialized dispersers.
槲寄生是具有启发性的研究案例,可用于探讨泛食性消费者在植物 - 动物相互作用研究中的作用。它们用于种子萌发的安全地点范围在所有植物中是最受限制的;因此,专门以槲寄生为食的食果动物被认为对于这些寄生植物的种子传播几乎是不可或缺的。然而,在许多槲寄生物种所占据的众多区域中缺乏这类专门的传播者,这就引发了一个问题:非专门的传播媒介是否能够成功地将槲寄生种子传播到狭窄定义的安全地点。以欧洲槲寄生白果槲寄生亚种作为研究案例,我们记录了广泛的11种传播槲寄生种子的鸟类。对于这些物种,我们研究了对槲寄生的访问率和取食行为,以估计传播有效性的数量成分,以及觅食后对微生境的利用、种子处理,以及不同微生境的萌发概率,以此作为有效性质量成分的衡量标准。内寄生传播和外寄生传播都是有效的传播机制,因为种子无需被摄取即可萌发,这增加了种子传播的多样性。画眉是最有效的传播者,尽管它们效率相当低,而小型鸟类(包括食果动物和非食果动物)提供的种子传播数量少但质量高,能直接将种子放置在安全地点。由于鸟类在寄生和未寄生的宿主上行为相似,且传播媒介的活动范围广泛,因此,由大量泛食性鸟类组成的群体可确保斑块内的再次感染和新斑块的定殖。因此,一种需要精确种子传播的寄生植物可以依赖非专门的传播者。