Gradient Corp., 44 Brattle Street, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Environ Geochem Health. 1989 Dec;11(3-4):163-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01758667.
This paper describes risk assessment methods for two chronic exposure pathways involving arsenic contaminated soil, namely inhalation of fugitive dust emissions over a lifetime, and inadvertent soil/house dust ingestion. The endpoint in the first case is assumed to be lung cancer and in the second case skin cancer. In order to estimate exposures, inhalation rates and soil/dust ingestion rates are estimated for different age groups; indoor/outdoor time budgets for different age groups are developed; and indoor surface dust and air arsenic concentrations are estimated based on outdoor concentration measurements. Differences observed in indoor/outdoor ratios and arsenic containing dust particle size among different types of communities are noted, as well as possible relationship of particle size to bioavailability. Calculations of risk are presented using cancer potency factors developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and uncertainties in these toxicity estimates are described based on: (1) evidence that arsenic may be neither a cancer initiator nor promotor, but may act instead as a late stage carcinogen and (2) evidence that the arsenic dose-response relationship for ingestion may be nonlinear at low doses due to increasing methylation of inorganic arsenic. The first of these considerations influences the relative importance ascribed to arsenic doses in different age groups. The latter consideration indicates that the risk estimates described here are probably very conservative.
本文描述了两种涉及砷污染土壤的慢性暴露途径的风险评估方法,即一生吸入逸散灰尘和无意中摄入土壤/房屋灰尘。第一种情况的终点假设为肺癌,第二种情况为皮肤癌。为了估计暴露量,我们针对不同年龄组估计了吸入率和土壤/灰尘摄入量;为不同年龄组制定了室内/外时间预算;并根据室外浓度测量值估算了室内表面灰尘和空气中的砷浓度。注意到不同类型社区的室内/外比值和含砷灰尘颗粒大小的差异,以及颗粒大小与生物利用度之间可能存在的关系。使用美国环境保护署制定的癌症效价因子来计算风险,并根据以下方面描述这些毒性估计的不确定性:(1)有证据表明,砷既不是癌症的启动剂也不是促进剂,而是可能作为晚期致癌剂起作用,(2)有证据表明,由于无机砷的甲基化增加,摄入的砷剂量-反应关系在低剂量下可能是非线性的。这些考虑因素中的第一个因素影响了不同年龄组中砷剂量的相对重要性。后一种考虑因素表明,这里描述的风险估计可能非常保守。