• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义记忆的模糊性:主观类别范例的选择。

Fuzziness in semantic memory: Choosing exemplars of subjective categories.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, 53706, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1977 Mar;5(2):198-204. doi: 10.3758/BF03197362.

DOI:10.3758/BF03197362
PMID:24202811
Abstract

Class membership is a fundamental relationship between concepts in semantic memory. Recent research indicates that, class membership may subjectively be a continuous type of relationship. The processing of information about the degree to which items belong to a particular class was investigated in an experiment in which subjects compared two statements describing class membership relationships. The results strongly supported a simple model which describes the judgment process as directly involving subjective degree-of-truthfulness values. The success of the model indicates that the subjects were able to process this kind of fuzzy information in a consistent and systematic manner. Some of the implications of the human competancy for processing fuzzy information are discussed.

摘要

类属关系是语义记忆中概念之间的基本关系。最近的研究表明,类属关系在主观上可能是一种连续的关系。在一项实验中,研究了对物品属于特定类别的程度的信息进行处理的过程,在该实验中,被试比较了两个描述类属关系的陈述。结果强烈支持了一个简单的模型,该模型将判断过程描述为直接涉及主观真实性值。该模型的成功表明,被试能够以一致和系统的方式处理这种模糊信息。讨论了人类处理模糊信息的能力的一些含义。

相似文献

1
Fuzziness in semantic memory: Choosing exemplars of subjective categories.语义记忆的模糊性:主观类别范例的选择。
Mem Cognit. 1977 Mar;5(2):198-204. doi: 10.3758/BF03197362.
2
A rule-based categorization deficit in Alzheimer's disease?阿尔茨海默病中基于规则的分类缺陷?
Brain Cogn. 2001 Mar;45(2):265-76. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1245.
3
[BASETY: Meaning extension and typicality of examples for 21 categories of objects].
Can J Exp Psychol. 2008 Dec;62(4):223-32. doi: 10.1037/a0012885.
4
A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures.一种用于污染场地修复对策多准则评估的模糊分析网络过程
J Environ Manage. 2008 Aug;88(3):479-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
5
Semantic categorisation of novel objects in frontotemporal dementia.额颞叶痴呆中新物体的语义分类。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006;23(4):541-62. doi: 10.1080/02643290542000094.
6
Places as fuzzy locational categories.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jan;202:102937. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102937. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Categorizing with overlapping categories.重叠类别分类。
Mem Cognit. 1978 Sep;6(5):481-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03198235.
8
Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.模糊痕迹理论:记忆、推理和认知神经科学中的双重加工
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:41-100. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80062-3.
9
Spared structural knowledge in a case of semantic dementia: implications for models of object recognition, semantic memory and structural description.语义性痴呆病例中结构知识未受损:对物体识别、语义记忆和结构描述模型的启示。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):2112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.013. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
10
[Forgetting: a product of memory].[遗忘:记忆的产物]
Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2005 Dec;3(4):301-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC).道德判断的范畴化(MJAC)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):131-152. doi: 10.1177/1745691621990636. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories.动物和人工制品类别的本质主义与等级成员关系。
Mem Cognit. 1995 May;23(3):335-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03197235.

本文引用的文献

1
The problem of inference from curves based on group data.基于分组数据的曲线推断问题。
Psychol Bull. 1956 Mar;53(2):134-40. doi: 10.1037/h0045156.