Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 02155, Medford, Masachusetts.
Mem Cognit. 1977 Sep;5(5):535-40. doi: 10.3758/BF03197397.
A statistical procedure that separates storage from retrieval was used to study the acoustic similarity effect as a function of retention interval in the Brown-Peterson paradigm. Both storage and retrieval components showed reliable and independent changes with retention interval, but only the storage component was affected by acoustic similarity. Hence, acoustic similarity affects trace durability and retrieval plays no essential role in the similarity effect. This finding is inconsistent with the address hypothesis (cf. Baddeley, 1968). It is argued that acoustic similarity induces subjects to encode the target item in a confused fashion, particularly in regard to order information.
采用一种将存储和提取分开的统计程序,研究了在布朗-彼得森范式中,作为保持间隔函数的声学相似性效应。存储和提取两个成分都与保持间隔有可靠且独立的变化,但只有存储成分受到声学相似性的影响。因此,声学相似性影响痕迹的耐久性,而提取在相似性效应中不起本质作用。这一发现与地址假说(参见 Baddeley,1968)不一致。有人认为,声学相似性导致被试以一种混乱的方式对目标项目进行编码,特别是在有关顺序信息方面。