Department of Psychology, Yale University, Box 11A Yale Station, 06520, New Haven, Connecticut.
Mem Cognit. 1978 Sep;6(5):518-26. doi: 10.3758/BF03198240.
Three experiments were conducted to determine the relative accessibility of semantic and deep-structure syntactic concepts. In Experiment 1, which employed a concept-formation task, subjects learned the concept "deep-structure subject" more slowly than the case concept "experiencer." In Experiments 2 and 3, which employed a new recognition memory procedure, subjects performed more poorly when the sentences to be remembered were differentiated on the basis of deep-structure syntactic relations than when they were differentiated on the basis of semantic relations. These results favor Fillmore's case grammar, or another semantically based theory, rather than the "standard theory" of Chomsky in a model of linguistic behavior.
进行了三项实验来确定语义和深层结构句法概念的相对可及性。在实验 1 中，采用概念形成任务，被试学习“深层结构主语”的速度比“经验者”概念慢。在实验 2 和 3 中，采用新的识别记忆程序，当需要记住的句子是基于深层结构句法关系而不是语义关系来区分时，被试的表现更差。这些结果支持 Fillmore 的格语法，或另一种基于语义的理论，而不是 Chomsky 的“标准理论”在语言行为模型中的观点。
