• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义案例的聚焦搜索:问题形式和案例状态的影响。

Focused search of semantic cases: the effects of question form and case status.

作者信息

Singer M, Jakobson L S

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1989 May;17(3):265-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03198464.

DOI:10.3758/bf03198464
PMID:2725263
Abstract

The present study was designed to identify and examine some of the variables that influence the focused search of semantic cases in question answering. Singer, Parbery, and Jakobson (1988) have previously reported that people can focus on the case interrogated by a question and can largely disregard irrelevant cases. In the present study, people learned facts, such as the pilot painted the garage with the roller, the spraygun, and the brush. One day later, they answered questions that focused on a particular case. For example, the question did the pilot paint with a spraygun? focuses on the instrument case. Experiment 1 revealed that people can focus on a particular case in response both to complete questions and to comparable word probes, such as "pilot spraygun." Therefore, the given-new structure of questions is not essential to focused search. Experiment 2 revealed that people have a difficult time ignoring the agent case, even when it is irrelevant to the question. This corroborates proposals that agent and action information are closely interrelated in the representation of a fact. These results help to delineate the phenomenon of the focused search of semantic cases.

摘要

本研究旨在识别和考察一些影响问答中语义格聚焦搜索的变量。辛格、帕贝里和雅各布森(1988年)此前曾报告称,人们能够聚焦于问题所询问的格,并能在很大程度上忽略无关的格。在本研究中,人们学习了一些事实,比如飞行员用滚筒、喷枪和刷子给车库刷漆。一天后,他们回答聚焦于特定格的问题。例如,“飞行员用喷枪刷漆了吗?”这个问题聚焦于工具格。实验1表明,人们能够针对完整问题以及类似的词探测(如“飞行员 喷枪”)聚焦于特定的格。因此,问题的已知-新信息结构对于聚焦搜索并非必不可少。实验2表明,人们很难忽略施事格,即使它与问题无关。这证实了关于施事和动作信息在事实表征中密切相关的观点。这些结果有助于描绘语义格聚焦搜索的现象。

相似文献

1
Focused search of semantic cases: the effects of question form and case status.语义案例的聚焦搜索:问题形式和案例状态的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1989 May;17(3):265-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03198464.
2
Accessing causal relations in semantic memory.获取语义记忆中的因果关系。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Sep;33(6):1036-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03193211.
3
Semantic and Syntactic Associations During Word Search Modulate the Relationship Between Attention and Subsequent Memory.单词搜索过程中的语义和句法关联调节注意力与后续记忆之间的关系。
J Gen Psychol. 2017 Jan-Mar;144(1):69-88. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2016.1258389.
4
Emotional speech processing: disentangling the effects of prosody and semantic cues.情感言语处理:剖析韵律和语义线索的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):834-53. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.516915. Epub 2011 May 24.
5
Focused search of semantic cases in question answering.问答中语义案例的聚焦搜索。
Mem Cognit. 1988 Mar;16(2):147-57. doi: 10.3758/bf03213484.
6
Verbal short-term memory capacities and executive function in semantic and syntactic interference resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia.言语短期记忆容量和执行功能在句子理解中的语义和句法干扰解决中的作用:来自失语症的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 May;113:111-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
7
Questions versus statements: challenging an assumption about semantic illusions.问题与陈述:挑战关于语义错觉的一种假设
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jun;60(6):779-89. doi: 10.1080/17470210701228744.
8
Personal semantics: Is it distinct from episodic and semantic memory? An electrophysiological study of memory for autobiographical facts and repeated events in honor of Shlomo Bentin.个人语义:它与情景记忆和语义记忆不同吗?一项关于自传性事实和重复事件记忆的电生理学研究,以纪念什洛莫·本廷。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Mar;83:242-256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
9
The role of semantic representations in verbal working memory.语义表征在言语工作记忆中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jun;44(6):863-881. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000475. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation.感知与语言经验中的冗余:比较基于特征和分布的语义表征模型
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;3(2):303-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01111.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The relative accessibility of semantic and deep-structure syntactic concepts.语义和深层结构句法概念的相对可及性。
Mem Cognit. 1978 Sep;6(5):518-26. doi: 10.3758/BF03198240.
2
A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: the role of integrating knowledge.干涉悖论的部分解决:整合知识的作用。
Cogn Psychol. 1980 Oct;12(4):447-72. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90016-x.
3
Focused memory search in fact retrieval.事实检索中的聚焦记忆搜索。
Mem Cognit. 1980 May;8(3):253-64. doi: 10.3758/bf03197613.
4
Topicalization effects in cued recall of technical prose.技术散文线索回忆中的主题化效应。
Mem Cognit. 1981 Nov;9(6):541-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03202348.
5
The perception of semantic relations in pictures.图片中语义关系的认知
Mem Cognit. 1982 Jul;10(4):381-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03202430.
6
The similarity and diversity of semantic relations.语义关系的相似性与多样性。
Mem Cognit. 1984 Mar;12(2):134-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03198427.
7
Focused search of semantic cases in question answering.问答中语义案例的聚焦搜索。
Mem Cognit. 1988 Mar;16(2):147-57. doi: 10.3758/bf03213484.