Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jan;15(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
To explore how quality of life (QoL) and quality of care (QoC) for people with dementia (PwD) vary across 8 European countries; to explore how QoL and QoC for PwD vary across living arrangements; and to assess the association between QoL and QoC.
Cross-sectional survey.
Institutional long term care and home care in 8 European countries (England, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden).
PwD receiving formal home care but at risk for admission to an institutional setting, and PwD who were recently admitted.
QoL was assessed by the PwD and by their best informed proxies using the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease scale (QoL-AD) (range 13-52). QoC was measured using quality of care indicators (eg, the presence of depressive symptoms, the presence of pressure ulcers).
A total of 1123 PwD living at home (mean age 82.2, 63%women) and 791 PwD living in institutional care (mean age 84.1, 74% women) participated. QoL of PwD was most often rated highest in Sweden and England and lowest in Estonia and Spain. No differences in QoL were detected among the settings. For the QoC indicators, no consistent patterns were visible in such a way that certain countries or settings scored "higher" or "lower." The presence of depressive symptoms was most consistently associated with lower QoL (P ≤ .001).
There is great variation in QoL and QoC scores among European countries and settings. To gain insight into the underlying causes of these differences, more knowledge is needed about the effect of different national health care systems and dementia strategies on QoL and QoC indicators. Depressive symptoms were associated with QoL, and executing longitudinal studies investigating which factors are associated with change in QoL is highly recommended.
探讨 8 个欧洲国家痴呆患者(PwD)的生活质量(QoL)和护理质量(QoC)的差异;探讨 PwD 的 QoL 和 QoC 如何因居住安排而异;评估 QoL 与 QoC 之间的关联。
横断面调查。
8 个欧洲国家(英国、爱沙尼亚、芬兰、法国、德国、荷兰、西班牙和瑞典)的机构长期护理和家庭护理。
接受正规家庭护理但有入院机构设置风险的 PwD,以及最近入院的 PwD。
使用生活质量-阿尔茨海默病量表(QoL-AD)(范围 13-52)由 PwD 和他们最了解的代理人评估 QoL。使用护理质量指标(例如,抑郁症状的存在、压疮的存在)来衡量 QoC。
共有 1123 名居住在家庭中的 PwD(平均年龄 82.2 岁,63%为女性)和 791 名居住在机构护理中的 PwD(平均年龄 84.1 岁,74%为女性)参与了研究。PwD 的 QoL 在瑞典和英国评分最高,在爱沙尼亚和西班牙评分最低。在不同的环境中,QoL 没有差异。对于 QoC 指标,没有出现一致性的模式,即某些国家或环境的评分“更高”或“更低”。抑郁症状的存在与 QoL 降低最相关(P ≤.001)。
欧洲国家和环境之间的 QoL 和 QoC 评分存在很大差异。为了深入了解这些差异的根本原因,需要更多了解不同的国家卫生保健系统和痴呆症策略对 QoL 和 QoC 指标的影响。抑郁症状与 QoL 相关,强烈建议进行纵向研究,以调查哪些因素与 QoL 的变化相关。