Lenkoski Alex, Eicher Theo S, Raftery Adrian E
Institute for Applied Mathematics, Heidelberg University.
Econom Rev. 2014;33(1-4). doi: 10.1080/07474938.2013.807150.
Economic modeling in the presence of endogeneity is subject to model uncertainty at both the instrument and covariate level. We propose a Two-Stage Bayesian Model Averaging (2SBMA) methodology that extends the Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) estimator. By constructing a Two-Stage Unit Information Prior in the endogenous variable model, we are able to efficiently combine established methods for addressing model uncertainty in regression models with the classic technique of 2SLS. To assess the validity of instruments in the 2SBMA context, we develop Bayesian tests of the identification restriction that are based on model averaged posterior predictive -values. A simulation study showed that 2SBMA has the ability to recover structure in both the instrument and covariate set, and substantially improves the sharpness of resulting coefficient estimates in comparison to 2SLS using the full specification in an automatic fashion. Due to the increased parsimony of the 2SBMA estimate, the Bayesian Sargan test had a power of 50 percent in detecting a violation of the exogeneity assumption, while the method based on 2SLS using the full specification had negligible power. We apply our approach to the problem of development accounting, and find support not only for institutions, but also for geography and integration as development determinants, once both model uncertainty and endogeneity have been jointly addressed.
存在内生性情况下的经济建模在工具变量和协变量层面都面临模型不确定性。我们提出了一种两阶段贝叶斯模型平均法(2SBMA),它扩展了两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)估计量。通过在内生变量模型中构建两阶段单位信息先验,我们能够有效地将处理回归模型中模型不确定性的既定方法与2SLS的经典技术结合起来。为了评估2SBMA背景下工具变量的有效性,我们基于模型平均后验预测值开发了识别约束的贝叶斯检验。一项模拟研究表明,2SBMA能够恢复工具变量集和协变量集中的结构,并且与自动采用完整设定的2SLS相比,能显著提高所得系数估计值的准确性。由于2SBMA估计量的简约性提高,贝叶斯萨根检验在检测外生性假设违反情况时的功效为50%,而基于完整设定的2SLS方法的功效可忽略不计。我们将我们的方法应用于增长核算问题,并且发现,一旦同时解决了模型不确定性和内生性问题,不仅制度因素,而且地理因素和一体化因素都可作为增长的决定因素得到支持。