Suppr超能文献

二头肌弯举中疲劳指数与次最大负荷重复最大值之间的关系。

Relationship between fatigue index and number of repetition maxima with sub-maximal loads in biceps curl.

机构信息

Coaching Education Department, Division of Movement and Training Sciences, School of Physical Education and Sports, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, TÜRKİYE.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2013 Oct 8;38:169-81. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0057. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the number of repetition maxima to volitional failure (RM) at 60%, 75%, 90% of 1RM and fatigue index (FI), a determinant of the muscular endurance level. Thirty four resistance trained male participants attended two testing sessions. The first session was conducted to assess 1RM load and RM at 60%, 75% and 90% of 1RM in the supine biceps curl (SBC) exercise. In the second session, a FI test protocol consisting of five sets of SBC with 90 s rest between sets was performed to determine FI values. Each set was performed to volitional failure using a sub-maximal load in the range of 15-20RM. Hypothetical high FI and low FI groups (17 participants with the highest and lowest FI values, respectively) were formed for statistical analyses. ANOVA results revealed that RM at 60%, 75%, 90% of 1RM were not significantly different between FI groups when controlled for mean repetition tempo (p=0.11, p=0.38, p=0.13, respectively). Pearson's correlation coefficients revealed that no significant relationship was present between FI values and RM at 60%, 75%, 90% of 1RM (p=0.40, p=0.46, p=0.14, respectively). In conclusion, the muscular endurance level of participants defined in terms of FI value was not an indicator of RM in SBC. Therefore, athletes with different muscular endurance levels can use similar percentages of 1RM in biceps curl exercise in their training programs when the aim is to elicit training adaptations related to specific RM zones.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨重复最大次数至意志失败(RM)的 60%、75%和 90%与疲劳指数(FI)之间的关系,FI 是肌肉耐力水平的决定因素。34 名有抗阻训练经验的男性参与者参加了两次测试。第一次测试用于评估仰卧臂弯举(SBC)运动中的 1RM 负荷和 RM 至 60%、75%和 90%的 1RM。第二次测试采用 5 组 SBC 测试方案,组间休息 90 秒,以确定 FI 值。每组均使用 15-20RM 范围内的亚最大负荷至意志失败。为了进行统计分析,假设形成了高 FI 和低 FI 组(FI 值最高和最低的各 17 名参与者)。方差分析结果表明,在控制平均重复节奏后,FI 组之间的 1RM 的 60%、75%和 90%RM 没有显著差异(分别为 p=0.11、p=0.38 和 p=0.13)。Pearson 相关系数显示,FI 值与 1RM 的 60%、75%和 90%RM 之间没有显著关系(分别为 p=0.40、p=0.46 和 p=0.14)。总之,以 FI 值定义的参与者的肌肉耐力水平不是 SBC 中 RM 的指标。因此,当目标是引起与特定 RM 区相关的训练适应时,不同肌肉耐力水平的运动员可以在他们的训练计划中使用类似的 1RM 百分比进行臂弯举练习。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验