• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心研究中单网片腹腔镜修补原发性和切口疝术后复发的预测因素。

Predictive factors of recurrence for laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias with single mesh from a multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Emergency and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, AOU Modena, Modena, Italy.

Department of Surgery, Santa Maria Della Scaletta Hospital, Imola, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):4215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08024-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-08024-3
PMID:35273288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8913731/
Abstract

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is a widely practiced treatment for primary (PH) and incisional (IH) hernias, with acceptable outcomes. Prevention of recurrence is crucial and still highly debated. Purpose of this study was to evaluate predictive factors of recurrence following LVHR with intraperitoneal onlay mesh with a single type of mesh for both PH and IH. A retrospective, multicentre study of data collected from patients who underwent LVHR for PH and IH with an intraperitoneal monofilament polypropylene mesh from January 2014 to December 2018 at 8 referral centers was conducted, and statistical analysis for risk factors of recurrence and post-operative outcomes was performed. A total of 1018 patients were collected, with 665 cases of IH (65.3%) and 353 of PH (34.7%). IH patients were older (p < 0.001), less frequently obese (p = 0.031), at higher ASA class (p < 0.001) and presented more frequently with large, swiss cheese type and border site defects (p < 0.001), compared to PH patients. Operative time and hospital stay were longer for IH (p < 0.001), but intraoperative and early post-operative complications and reinterventions were comparable. IH group presented at major risk of recurrence than PH (6.7% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001) and application of absorbable tacks resulted a significative predictive factor for recurrence increasing the risk by 2.94 (95% CI 1.18-7.31). LVHR with a light-weight polypropylene mesh has low intra- and post-operative complications and is appropriate for both IH and PH. Non absorbable tacks and mixed fixation system seem to be preferable to absorbable tacks alone.

摘要

腹腔镜腹疝修补术(LVHR)是一种广泛应用于原发性(PH)和切口疝(IH)的治疗方法,其治疗效果可接受。预防复发是至关重要的,目前仍存在高度争议。本研究的目的是评估使用同种网片行腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(LVHR)治疗 PH 和 IH 的复发预测因素。对 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在 8 家转诊中心接受腹腔镜腹腔内单丝聚丙烯网片治疗 PH 和 IH 的患者数据进行回顾性、多中心研究,并对复发和术后结果的危险因素进行统计分析。共收集了 1018 例患者,其中 IH 患者 665 例(65.3%),PH 患者 353 例(34.7%)。与 PH 患者相比,IH 患者年龄更大(p<0.001)、肥胖发生率更低(p=0.031)、ASA 分级更高(p<0.001),且更常出现大型、瑞士奶酪型和边缘部位缺损(p<0.001)。IH 患者的手术时间和住院时间更长(p<0.001),但术中及术后早期并发症和再干预率相似。与 PH 患者相比,IH 患者的复发风险更高(6.7% vs 0.9%,p<0.001),使用可吸收钉会显著增加复发风险,使复发风险增加 2.94 倍(95%CI 1.18-7.31)。使用轻质聚丙烯网片行 LVHR 具有较低的围手术期并发症,适用于 IH 和 PH。非吸收性钉和混合固定系统似乎优于单纯使用可吸收钉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8913731/8562850b52e5/41598_2022_8024_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8913731/85978b89ab6c/41598_2022_8024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8913731/8562850b52e5/41598_2022_8024_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8913731/85978b89ab6c/41598_2022_8024_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/656d/8913731/8562850b52e5/41598_2022_8024_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive factors of recurrence for laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias with single mesh from a multicenter study.多中心研究中单网片腹腔镜修补原发性和切口疝术后复发的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):4215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08024-3.
2
Titanium versus absorbable tacks comparative study (TACS): a multicenter, non-inferiority prospective evaluation during laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.钛钉与可吸收钉对比研究(TACS):腹腔镜修补腹直肌旁疝和切口疝的多中心、非劣效性前瞻性评估:随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jun 4;16:249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0779-x.
3
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
4
Pain and convalescence following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后的疼痛与康复
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Dec;58(12):B4369.
5
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
6
Lightweight polypropylene mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.腹腔镜切口疝修补术中轻质聚丙烯网片固定术
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013 Sep;22(5):283-7. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2013.808228. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
7
Predictive Factors of Recurrence After Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study.腹腔镜切口疝修补术后复发的预测因素:一项回顾性多中心队列研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 May;33(5):427-433. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0465. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
8
Retrospective comparison of open versus laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.开放性与腹腔镜下腹侧及切口疝修补术的回顾性比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Aug;7(3):246-50. doi: 10.1111/ases.12108. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
9
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Ventral hernia is a chronic disease: a systematic review of long-term outcomes beyond 5 years.腹疝是一种慢性疾病:对5年以上长期结局的系统评价
Hernia. 2025 May 8;29(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03351-6.
2
Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Plus (IPOM Plus) With Mobilizing the Urinary Bladder for Suprapubic Incisional Hernia Repair: A Case Report.腹腔镜腹膜内覆盖补片加(IPOM加)联合膀胱游离用于耻骨上切口疝修补:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73117. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) "Swiss Cheese" Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair with Urinary Bladder Mobilization: A Case Report.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa repair (eTEP-RS) for ventral and incisional hernias - early operative outcomes and technical remarks on a novel retromuscular approach.腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa修补术(eTEP-RS)治疗腹直肌旁疝和切口疝——早期手术结果及一种新型肌后入路的技术要点
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Dec;15(4):533-545. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.99371. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
New techniques in ventral hernia surgery - an evolution of minimally-invasivehernia repairs.腹外疝手术新技术——微创疝修补术的发展。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2020 Jan 30;92(3):48-56. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.7857.
3
腹腔镜腹腔内补片(IPOM)“瑞士奶酪”式腹壁切口疝修补术联合膀胱移位:一例报告。
Am J Case Rep. 2022 Nov 18;23:e937606. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.937606.
Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature.
对原发性腹侧(PVH)和切口疝(IH)修复的汇总数据分析不再被接受:对当前文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析的结果。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):831-845. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02033-4. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?原发性非复杂性中线腹前壁疝:腹腔镜 IPOM 仍是合理的方法吗?
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02031-6. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
5
Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients.腹腔镜 IPOM 与开放式下修补术治疗择期切口疝修补术的比较:基于注册的、倾向评分匹配的 9907 例患者比较。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06629-2. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open intraperitoneal onlay mesh incisional hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开放式腹腔内补片修补术治疗切口疝的长期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6298-6. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
Absorbable versus non-absorbable tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.可吸收与不可吸收缝线在腹腔镜腹疝修补术中固定补片的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.042. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Primary and incisional ventral hernias are different in terms of patient characteristics and postoperative complications - A prospective cohort study of 4,565 patients.原发性和切口腹疝在患者特征和术后并发症方面存在差异-一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 4565 例患者。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
9
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: Results of a two thousand patients prospective multicentric database.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:两千例患者前瞻性多中心数据库结果。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Mini- or Less-open Sublay Operation (MILOS): A New Minimally Invasive Technique for the Extraperitoneal Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernias.迷你或微创经腹侧入路手术(MILOS):一种用于切口疝腹膜外补片修复的新型微创技术。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):748-755. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002661.