Suppr超能文献

超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞治疗下颈段神经根性疼痛的疗效:一项为期1年随访的回顾性研究

Treatment Effects of Ultrasound Guide Selective Nerve Root Block for Lower Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study of 1-Year Follow-up.

作者信息

Park Yongbum, Ahn Jae Ki, Sohn Yukyung, Jee Haemi, Lee Ji Hae, Kim Jongwoo, Park Ki Deok

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;37(5):658-67. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.658. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term effects and advantages of ultrasound (US)-guided selective cervical nerve root block with fluoroscopy (FL)-guided transforaminal block.

METHODS

From March 2009 to November 2012, 162 patients received steroid injections for lower cervical radicular pain. A total of 114 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All procedures were performed by using US or FL. We compared the intravascular injections during the procedure with the effects and functional scales at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure between the two groups. Successful treatments occurred when patients obtained significant pain reliefs (as measured by >50% improvements in the verbal numerical scale [VNS] score and >40% improvements in the neck disability index [NDI] score) and reported a patient satisfaction score of 3 or 4 points at 12 months after the injection. Image analysis of intravascular injection and chart review were performed. Logistic regression was performed to reveal the correlations between successful treatments and variables (patient's age, gender, duration of the disease, cause, injection method, and radiologic finding).

RESULTS

The VNS and NDI improved 3 months after the injection and continued to improve until 12 months for both groups. But there were no statistical differences in changes of VNS, NDI, and effectiveness between these two groups. The proportion of patients with successful treatment is illustrated as 62.5% in US-guided group and 58% in FL-guided group at 12 months. There were no significant differences between the groups or during follow-up periods. Three cases of the intravascular injections were done in FL-guided group.

CONCLUSION

The US-guided selective cervical nerve root blocks are facilitated by identifying critical vessels at unexpected locations relative to the foramen and to protect injury to such vessels, which is the leading cause of reported complications from FL-guided transforaminal blocks. On treatment effect, significant long-term improvements in functions and pain reliefs were observed in both groups after the intervention. However, significant differences were not observed between the groups. Therefore, the US-guided selective cervical nerve root block was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided transforaminal block in pain reliefs and functional improvements, in addition to the absence of radiation and protection vessel injury at real-time imaging.

摘要

目的

比较超声(US)引导下选择性颈神经根阻滞与透视(FL)引导下经椎间孔阻滞的长期效果及优势。

方法

2009年3月至2012年11月,162例因下颈神经根性疼痛接受类固醇注射治疗的患者中,共有114例符合纳入标准。所有操作均采用超声或透视进行。我们比较了两组在操作过程中的血管内注射情况以及操作后3个月、6个月和12个月时的效果和功能量表。当患者疼痛明显缓解(以言语数字评分量表[VNS]评分改善>50%和颈部功能障碍指数[NDI]评分改善>40%衡量)且注射后12个月患者满意度评分为3或4分时,治疗成功。进行了血管内注射的图像分析和病历审查。采用逻辑回归分析揭示治疗成功与变量(患者年龄、性别、病程、病因、注射方法和影像学表现)之间的相关性。

结果

两组患者注射后3个月时VNS和NDI均有所改善,且持续改善至12个月。但两组之间VNS、NDI的变化及有效性无统计学差异。12个月时,超声引导组治疗成功的患者比例为62.5%,透视引导组为58%。两组之间及随访期间均无显著差异。透视引导组发生了3例血管内注射。

结论

超声引导下选择性颈神经根阻滞有助于识别相对于椎间孔在意外位置的关键血管,并保护这些血管免受损伤,而这是透视引导下经椎间孔阻滞报告并发症的主要原因。在治疗效果方面,两组干预后在功能和疼痛缓解方面均观察到显著的长期改善。然而,两组之间未观察到显著差异。因此,超声引导下选择性颈神经根阻滞在缓解疼痛和改善功能方面与透视引导下经椎间孔阻滞同样有效,此外还不存在辐射且在实时成像时能保护血管免受损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc2/3825942/bd951634d512/arm-37-658-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验