• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下颈椎选择性神经根阻滞与透视引导下椎板间硬膜外注射治疗神经根型颈椎病的随机、前瞻性对照研究

Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study.

作者信息

Kose Halil Cihan, Guven Kose Selin, Celikel Feyza, Tulgar Serkan, Akkaya Omer Taylan

机构信息

Department of Pain Medicine, Health Science University Kocaeli City Hospital, 41060 Kocaeli, Turkey.

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, 54120 Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):721. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070721.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14070721
PMID:39063975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11278421/
Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-guided cervical selective nerve root block (CSNRB) procedures are increasingly being performed as an alternative to conventional fluoroscopy (FL)-guided epidural injections for the treatment of cervical radicular pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of US-guided CSNRB versus FL-guided interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection (IL-CESI) for cervical radicular pain. A total of 60 patients with cervical radicular pain due to a single-level disc herniation were randomized into either the FL or US group. The numeric rating scale, Short Form-36, and neck disability index were evaluated before treatment at months 1, 3, and 6 after treatment. Procedure time, complications, pain medication consumption, and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Patients experienced significant improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life scores up to 6 months after the procedure ( < 0.001). Treatment success rate was achieved in 56.6% of the IL-CESI group and 50% of the CSNRB group without any significant difference between the study arms ( = 0.617). US-guided CSNRB was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided IL-CESI in the treatment of cervical radicular pain, in addition to the absence of radiation exposure and requiring less procedure time.

摘要

超声(US)引导下的颈椎选择性神经根阻滞(CSNRB)作为传统透视(FL)引导下硬膜外注射治疗颈椎神经根性疼痛的替代方法,应用越来越广泛。本研究旨在比较US引导下CSNRB与FL引导下颈椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(IL-CESI)治疗颈椎神经根性疼痛的有效性。将60例因单节段椎间盘突出导致颈椎神经根性疼痛的患者随机分为FL组或US组。在治疗前、治疗后1个月、3个月和6个月时评估数字评分量表、简明健康状况调查量表(Short Form-36)和颈部功能障碍指数。记录操作时间、并发症、止痛药物消耗和患者满意度。患者在术后6个月内疼痛、功能障碍和生活质量评分均有显著改善(<0.001)。IL-CESI组的治疗成功率为56.6%,CSNRB组为50%,两组之间无显著差异(=0.617)。结果表明,US引导下的CSNRB在治疗颈椎神经根性疼痛方面与FL引导下的IL-CESI同样有效,此外还不存在辐射暴露且操作时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/11278421/93f5048f241a/jpm-14-00721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/11278421/93f5048f241a/jpm-14-00721-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb75/11278421/93f5048f241a/jpm-14-00721-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study.超声引导下颈椎选择性神经根阻滞与透视引导下椎板间硬膜外注射治疗神经根型颈椎病的随机、前瞻性对照研究
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):721. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070721.
2
Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study.超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞与透视引导下经椎间孔硬膜外阻滞和透视引导下黄韧带间硬膜外阻滞治疗下颈椎神经根痛的回顾性比较研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Jun 13;2020:9103421. doi: 10.1155/2020/9103421. eCollection 2020.
3
Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study.超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞与透视引导下椎板间硬膜外阻滞治疗下颈椎神经根性疼痛的回顾性比较研究
J Ultrasound. 2019 Jun;22(2):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s40477-018-0344-z. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
4
An open-label non-inferiority randomized trail comparing the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided selective cervical nerve root block and fluoroscopy-guided cervical transforaminal epidural block for cervical radiculopathy.一项开放性标签非劣效性随机试验,比较超声引导下选择性颈椎神经根阻滞和透视引导下颈椎椎间孔硬膜外阻滞治疗颈椎病的有效性和安全性。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):2681-2691. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2124445.
5
Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study.超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞与透视引导下经椎间孔阻滞治疗下颈椎神经根性疼痛:一项随机、盲法、对照研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jan;42(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1434-1. Epub 2012 May 20.
6
Comparison of Selective Nerve Root Pulsed Radiofrequency Vs Paramedian Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Painful Cervical Radiculopathy.选择性神经根脉冲射频与旁正中经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗颈神经根病疼痛的比较。
Pain Physician. 2024 Feb;27(2):E221-E229.
7
Combined Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy versus Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Comparative Study.超声联合透视与单纯超声或透视引导下腰骶部硬膜外类固醇注射治疗单侧下肢根性疼痛的回顾性对比研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 15;60(5):809. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050809.
8
Treatment Effects of Ultrasound Guide Selective Nerve Root Block for Lower Cervical Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study of 1-Year Follow-up.超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞治疗下颈段神经根性疼痛的疗效:一项为期1年随访的回顾性研究
Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;37(5):658-67. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.658. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
9
Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of cervical nerve root for cervical radicular pain: a prospective randomized controlled trial.超声引导下颈神经根脉冲射频治疗颈神经根性疼痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2023 May;23(5):651-655. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
10
Ultrasound-guided Versus Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-assisted Cervical Transforaminal Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Randomized Single-blind Controlled Noninferiority Study.超声引导与计算机断层扫描透视辅助下颈椎椎间孔类固醇注射治疗下颈椎神经根性疼痛的随机单盲对照非劣效性研究
Clin J Pain. 2023 Feb 1;39(2):68-75. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001091.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Approach of Ultrasound-Guided Transforaminal Cervical Nerve Root Injection With Fluoroscopic Validation: A Case Report and Technical Illustration.一种超声引导下经椎间孔颈椎神经根注射并经透视验证的新方法:病例报告及技术说明
Cureus. 2024 Dec 1;16(12):e74937. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74937. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided PENG block intraarticular corticosteroid injection in hip osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled study.超声引导下梨状肌阻滞联合关节内注射皮质类固醇治疗髋骨关节炎:一项随机对照研究
Korean J Pain. 2023 Apr 1;36(2):195-207. doi: 10.3344/kjp.22325.
2
Evaluating the Extent of Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block in the Lower Cervical Spine: Evidence Based on Computed Tomography Images.评估超声引导下颈椎下段选择性神经根阻滞的范围:基于计算机断层扫描图像的证据
J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 6;16:669-676. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S399431. eCollection 2023.
3
Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve radiofrequency treatment: prospective randomized comparative trial of a 3-nerve protocol versus a 5-nerve protocol.
超声引导下关节神经射频治疗:3 神经与 5 神经方案的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Pain Med. 2023 Jul 5;24(7):758-767. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad025.
4
Chronic Pain: An Update of Clinical Practices and Advances in Chronic Pain Management.慢性疼痛:慢性疼痛管理的临床实践与进展更新
Eurasian J Med. 2022 Dec;54(Suppl1):57-61. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22307.
5
Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a review of efficacy and safety.经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射与经皮椎间孔硬膜外注射:疗效和安全性的综述。
Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Oct;52(10):1825-1840. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04124-3. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Parasagittal Interlaminar and Transforaminal Cervical Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients with Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.矢状旁路与经椎间孔颈椎硬膜外类固醇注射治疗颈椎根性痛的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Pain Physician. 2021 Mar;24(2):117-125.
7
Risk Factors of Intervertebral Disc Pathology-A Point of View Formerly and Today-A Review.椎间盘病变的危险因素——过去与现在的观点——综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 21;10(3):409. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030409.
8
Complications of Fluoroscopically Guided Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections.荧光引导下颈椎椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的并发症。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Aug 26;24(10):63. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00897-1.
9
A Randomized Comparative Trial of Targeted Steroid Injection via Epidural Catheter vs Standard Transforaminal Epidural Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Cervical Radicular Pain: Six-Month Results.经硬膜外导管靶向注射类固醇与标准经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗单侧颈神经根性疼痛的随机对照试验:六个月结果
Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2077-2089. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa242.
10
Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study.超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞与透视引导下经椎间孔硬膜外阻滞和透视引导下黄韧带间硬膜外阻滞治疗下颈椎神经根痛的回顾性比较研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Jun 13;2020:9103421. doi: 10.1155/2020/9103421. eCollection 2020.