• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将利益相关者观点纳入比较效益研究的翻译表框架制定中。

Incorporating stakeholder perspectives in developing a translation table framework for comparative effectiveness research.

机构信息

Outcome, A Quintiles Company, 201 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):281-92. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.25.

DOI:10.2217/cer.12.25
PMID:24237409
Abstract

This project used a stakeholder-driven process to understand the factors that drive the selection of study designs for comparative effectiveness research (CER). The project assembled a diverse stakeholder committee to explore the basis of a translation framework and gathered input through surveys, interviews and an in-person meeting. Stakeholders recommended different study designs for the CER topic areas and identified different outcomes as the most important outcomes to study in each area. During the discussions, stakeholders described a variety of factors that influenced their study design recommendations. The stakeholder activities resulted in the identification of several key themes, including the need to have a highly specific detailed research question before discussing appropriate designs and the need to use multiple studies, potentially of different designs, to address the CER topic areas. The insights and themes from this project may inform efforts to develop a translation table.

摘要

本项目采用利益相关者驱动的流程,以了解驱动比较效果研究(CER)研究设计选择的因素。该项目组建了一个多元化的利益相关者委员会,以探索翻译框架的基础,并通过调查、访谈和现场会议收集意见。利益相关者为 CER 主题领域推荐了不同的研究设计,并确定了不同的结果作为每个领域最需要研究的结果。在讨论过程中,利益相关者描述了影响他们研究设计建议的各种因素。利益相关者的活动确定了几个关键主题,包括在讨论合适的设计之前需要有一个高度具体的详细研究问题,以及需要使用多个研究,可能是不同的设计,来解决 CER 主题领域的问题。该项目的见解和主题可能为制定翻译表的工作提供信息。

相似文献

1
Incorporating stakeholder perspectives in developing a translation table framework for comparative effectiveness research.将利益相关者观点纳入比较效益研究的翻译表框架制定中。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):281-92. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.25.
2
A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.在紧迫的时间内完成艰巨的任务:利益相关者对使用电子临床数据进行的比较有效性研究的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Sep;1(5):441-51. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.47.
3
IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research.IMPACCT儿童关爱计划:利益相关者参与比较效果研究的一个现实案例。
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):351-7. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.24.
4
A translation table for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research: guidance to improve the value of research for clinical and health policy decision-making.以患者为中心的比较效果研究翻译表:指导意见,提高研究对临床和卫生政策决策的价值。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):259-62. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.22.
5
Which design for which question? An exploration toward a translation table for comparative effectiveness research.哪种设计针对哪种问题?对比较有效性研究翻译表的探索。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):271-9. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.24.
6
Comparative effectiveness research in the U.S.A.: when will there be an impact on healthcare decision-making?美国的比较疗效研究:何时会对医疗保健决策产生影响?
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Mar;5(2):207-16. doi: 10.2217/cer-2015-0018. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.比较疗效研究对介入性疼痛管理的影响:从医疗保险现代化法案到患者保护与平价医疗法案以及患者为中心的医疗成果研究所的演变。
Pain Physician. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):E249-82.
8
Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).实用指南:了解比较疗效研究(CER)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;149(6):804-12. doi: 10.1177/0194599813506539. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
9
Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.比较疗效研究的事实、谬论和政治:第一部分。基本考虑。
Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E23-54.
10
Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research for cancer diagnostics using a regional stakeholder approach.采用区域利益相关者方法优先开展癌症诊断的比较效果研究。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 May;1(3):241-55. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.16.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.医疗补助人群比较效果研究需求的利益相关者评估
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):465-71. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.26. Epub 2015 Sep 21.