Suppr超能文献

食物处理时间会影响亚成年普通渡鸦(Corvus corax)的攻击行为吗?

Will food-handling time influence agonistic behaviour in sub-adult common ravens (Corvus corax)?

作者信息

Pfuhl Gerit, Gattermayr Matthias, Bugnyar Thomas

机构信息

Konrad Lorenz Research Station Grünau, University of Vienna, Austria; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience Unit, Norges Teknisk Naturvitenskapelig Universitet, Trondheim, Norway.

Konrad Lorenz Research Station Grünau, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

Abstract

Discovering a food source may invoke either competition or cooperation, depending on many factors such as divisibility and accessibility. We experimentally investigated the influence of effort to procure food on the tolerance towards others during feeding. Nine sub-adult captive ravens were tested in different foraging contexts that differed in foraging effort, namely three string-pulling conditions and two without pulling requirement. We expected that the effort to gain access to food would positively affect the tolerance towards others at feeding. As predicted, we found fewer agonistic interactions, fewer displacements of subordinates from food and prolonged feeding bouts in the three string-pulling conditions compared to the two conditions when no pulling was involved. Further, in the string pulling tasks interactions occurred mostly on the perch before pulling and only rarely was pulling interrupted by agonistic interactions. The rate of interactions did not change over trials. Our data suggests that perceived effort influences social behaviour.

摘要

发现食物来源可能引发竞争或合作,这取决于许多因素,如可分性和可获取性。我们通过实验研究了获取食物的努力程度对进食时对其他个体的容忍度的影响。九只亚成年圈养乌鸦在不同觅食情境下接受测试,这些情境在觅食难度上有所不同,即三种拉绳条件和两种无拉绳要求的条件。我们预计获取食物的努力程度会对进食时对其他个体的容忍度产生积极影响。正如预期的那样,我们发现与两种无拉绳条件相比,在三种拉绳条件下,争斗性互动更少,下属被食物驱赶的情况更少,进食时间更长。此外,在拉绳任务中,互动大多发生在拉绳前的栖木上,拉绳很少被争斗性互动打断。互动率在各试验中没有变化。我们的数据表明,感知到的努力会影响社会行为。

相似文献

7
Two strings to choose from: do ravens pull the easier one?两种选择:渡鸦会选择更容易的那一个吗?
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):549-57. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0483-0. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
9
Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation.渡鸦(Corvus corax)合作中的伙伴选择
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 10;11(6):e0156962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156962. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Social cognition in ravens.渡鸦的社会认知
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2013;8:1-12. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2013.80001.
3
Two strings to choose from: do ravens pull the easier one?两种选择:渡鸦会选择更容易的那一个吗?
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):549-57. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0483-0. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Animal personality due to social niche specialisation.动物的个性源于社会生态位特化。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Sep;25(9):504-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
9
Individual and sex differences in learning abilities of ravens.渡鸦学习能力的个体差异与性别差异。
Behav Processes. 2006 Jul;73(1):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 Apr 15.
10
Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators.黑猩猩会招募最优秀的合作者。
Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1297-300. doi: 10.1126/science.1123007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验