Occupational Therapy Program, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, 53130, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
J Occup Rehabil. 1993 Sep;3(3):145-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01078284.
Back schools are increasingly utilized as an injury prevention strategy employed at the worksite. Yet, evidence of the efficacy of back schools is limited and controversial. A review of the literature showed variance in methodologies and consequently, outcomes. Outcome measures used include physical capacity, functional abilities, costs, lost time, absenteeism, perception of pain, lifting performance, attitudes, and job satisfaction. In many studies, lack of randomization and control was found to be a limitation in experimental design. Studies which used the behavioral approach of measuring lifting behavior lacked followup and evidence of long-term effects. The type of education and feedback or reinforcement was an important issue not well-defined in the literature. A variety of hypothetical mechanisms were described as contributing to the outcome of back injury prevention programs. Additional controlled research is necessary to determine the specific mechanisms of change in an effort to further improve outcome in this area.
背伤防治学校在工作场所越来越多地被用作一种预防伤害的策略。然而,背伤防治学校的功效证据有限且存在争议。对文献的回顾显示,方法学存在差异,因此结果也存在差异。使用的结果衡量标准包括身体能力、功能能力、成本、损失时间、旷工、疼痛感知、举重表现、态度和工作满意度。在许多研究中,发现缺乏随机化和对照是实验设计的一个限制。那些使用测量举重行为的行为方法的研究缺乏随访和长期效果的证据。教育和反馈或强化的类型是文献中未明确界定的一个重要问题。各种假设的机制被描述为对背伤预防计划的结果有影响。需要进一步的对照研究来确定具体的变化机制,以便在这一领域进一步改善结果。