Suppr超能文献

男性的工作经历、工作环境与腰痛之间的关系。

The relationship between work history, work environment and low-back pain in men.

作者信息

Damkot D K, Pope M H, Lord J, Frymoyer J W

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 May-Jun;9(4):395-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198405000-00012.

Abstract

Interviews were conducted with 303 men to determine aspects of work history and working environment that are related to low-back pain. Respondents included no pain, moderate pain, and severe pain samples. Data were obtained for 150 variables including task frequencies, weights lifted, lifting postures, type of floor surface, type of chair support, pushing, pulling, and carrying activities, driving vehicles, and attributions of pain occurrence to particular situations. Univariate analyses showed difference among the three pain groups for lifting method, having had lifting instruction, stretching and reaching activities, amount of sitting and twisting in seat, pushing materials of varied weights, and contributions of pain onset. Multivariate regression analyses selected activities from (1) standing and lifting, (2) carrying, pushing, and pulling, (3) sitting, (4) driving vehicles, and (5) using vibrating equipment that jointly explained pain group variance. The significant variables from each domain were used in second-level multiple regressions to explain differences between no pain and pain, and between moderate and severe pain. Computed weights for pulling, lifting method, weight carried, reaching and stretching, chair support, number of times/day in-out of chair, and heavy vibration exposure explained 27% of variance between moderate and severe pain groups. Weights for automobile driving, number of times/day in-out of vehicle, number of lifts/day, maximum weight pulled, sitting with feet on floor, and exposure to heavy vibration explained 23% of the variance between no pain and pain groups.

摘要

对303名男性进行了访谈,以确定与腰痛相关的工作经历和工作环境方面的情况。受访者包括无疼痛、中度疼痛和重度疼痛样本。获取了150个变量的数据,包括任务频率、举起的重量、举起重物的姿势、地面类型、椅子支撑类型、推、拉和搬运活动、驾驶车辆以及疼痛发生归因于特定情况等。单因素分析显示,在三个疼痛组之间,举起重物的方法、是否接受过举起重物的指导、伸展和够取活动、在座位上坐立和扭转的程度、推不同重量的物品以及疼痛发作的原因等方面存在差异。多变量回归分析从以下方面选择活动:(1)站立和举起重物,(2)搬运、推和拉,(3)坐着,(4)驾驶车辆,以及(5)使用振动设备,这些活动共同解释了疼痛组之间的差异。每个领域的显著变量用于二级多元回归,以解释无疼痛组与疼痛组之间以及中度疼痛组与重度疼痛组之间的差异。计算得出的拉、举起重物的方法、搬运的重量、伸展和够取、椅子支撑、每天进出椅子的次数以及重度振动暴露的权重,解释了中度疼痛组与重度疼痛组之间27%的差异。汽车驾驶、每天进出车辆的次数、每天举起重物的次数、最大拉重、脚踩在地板上坐着以及重度振动暴露的权重,解释了无疼痛组与疼痛组之间23%的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验