Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Current adjuvant therapy for advanced-stage, recurrent, and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) has not reduced mortality from this malignancy, and novel systemic therapies are imperative. Oncolytic viral therapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of gynecologic cancers, and we investigated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of the Edmonston strain of measles virus (MV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) on EC.
Human EC cell lines (HEC-1-A, Ishikawa, KLE, RL95-2, AN3 CA, ARK-1, ARK-2, and SPEC-2) were infected with Edmonston strain MV expressing the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter, VSV expressing either human or murine IFN-β, or recombinant VSV with a methionine deletion at residue 51 of the matrix protein and expressing the sodium iodide symporter. Xenografts of HEC-1-A and AN3 CA generated in athymic mice were treated with intratumoral MV or VSV or intravenous VSV.
In vitro, all cell lines were susceptible to infection and cell killing by all 3 VSV strains except KLE. In addition, the majority of EC cell lines were defective in their ability to respond to type I IFN. Intratumoral VSV-treated tumors regressed more rapidly than MV-treated tumors, and intravenous VSV resulted in effective tumor control in 100% of mice. Survival was significantly longer for mice treated with any of the 3 VSV strains compared with saline.
VSV is clearly more potent in EC oncolysis than MV. A phase 1 clinical trial of VSV in EC is warranted.
目前针对晚期、复发性和高危子宫内膜癌(EC)的辅助治疗并未降低这种恶性肿瘤的死亡率,因此需要新型的系统治疗方法。溶瘤病毒治疗已被证明在妇科癌症的治疗中是有效的,我们研究了麻疹病毒(MV)和水疱性口炎病毒(VSV)Edmonston 株在 EC 中的体外和体内疗效。
用人 EC 细胞系(HEC-1-A、Ishikawa、KLE、RL95-2、AN3 CA、ARK-1、ARK-2 和 SPEC-2)感染表达甲状腺钠碘转运体的 Edmonston 株 MV、表达人或鼠 IFN-β的 VSV、或表达钠碘转运体且基质蛋白第 51 位蛋氨酸缺失的重组 VSV。在无胸腺鼠中生成的 HEC-1-A 和 AN3 CA 异种移植物用瘤内 MV 或 VSV 或静脉内 VSV 进行治疗。
在体外,除了 KLE 之外,所有细胞系都容易被所有 3 种 VSV 株感染和细胞杀伤。此外,大多数 EC 细胞系在对 I 型 IFN 作出反应的能力上存在缺陷。瘤内 VSV 治疗的肿瘤比 MV 治疗的肿瘤更快消退,静脉内 VSV 使 100%的小鼠有效控制了肿瘤。与生理盐水相比,用任何一种 VSV 株治疗的小鼠的存活时间明显更长。
VSV 在 EC 的溶瘤作用明显强于 MV。在 EC 中进行 VSV 的 I 期临床试验是合理的。