Central Regional Forensic Services, Wellington, New Zealand.
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;6(1):1-17. doi: 10.1111/appy.12109. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
This article was commissioned to collate and review forensic psychiatric services provided in a number of key Pacific Rim locations in the hope that it will assist in future dialogue about service development. The Board of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists identified experts in forensic psychiatry from Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, and the US. Each contributor provided an account of issues in their jurisdiction, including mental health services to mentally disordered offenders in prison, competence or fitness to stand trial, legal insanity as a defense at trial, diminished responsibility, and special forensic services available, including forensic hospitals and community forensic mental health services. Responses have been collated and are presented topic by topic and country by country within the body of this review. The availability of mental health screening and psychiatric in-reach or forensic liaison services within prisons differed considerably between countries, as did provisioning of community forensic mental health and rehabilitation services. Diversion of mentally disordered offenders to forensic, state, or hybrid hospitals was common. Legal constructs of criminal responsibility (insanity defense) and fitness to stand trial ("disability") are almost universally recognized, although variably used. Disparities between unmet needs and resourcing available were common themes. The legislative differences between contributing countries with respect to the mental health law and criminal law relating to mentally disordered offenders are relatively subtle. The major differences lie in operationalizing and resourcing forensic services.
本文旨在汇集和审查多个环太平洋地区关键地点提供的法医精神病服务,希望能有助于未来开展服务发展方面的对话。环太平洋精神病学院董事会从澳大利亚、加拿大、中国、中国香港、日本、俄罗斯、新加坡、中国台湾和美国聘请了法医精神病学专家。每位撰稿人都介绍了其管辖范围内的问题,包括在监狱中为有精神障碍的罪犯提供心理健康服务、审判时的能力或适宜性、作为审判辩护的法律上的精神错乱、减轻责任,以及包括法医医院和社区法医心理健康服务在内的特殊法医服务。本综述按照专题和国家汇总了各国的答复。各国之间在监狱内提供心理健康筛查和精神病学外联或法医联络服务的情况差异很大,社区法医心理健康和康复服务的提供情况也各不相同。将有精神障碍的罪犯转至法医、州或混合医院的情况很常见。刑事责任的法律构建(精神错乱辩护)和适宜性审判(“残疾”)几乎普遍得到承认,但使用情况各不相同。未满足的需求与现有资源之间的差距是常见的主题。与有精神障碍的罪犯有关的精神卫生法和刑法方面的立法差异在贡献国中相对微妙。主要区别在于法医服务的运作和资源配置。