a Physical Education and Sport , University of Seville , Seville , Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(6):666-73. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2013.774052. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a bout of whole body vibration (WBV) on muscle response and to determine whether this stimulus leads to muscle damage. Thirty healthy and physically active participants (mean ± SD; age: 21.8 ± 2.0 years; height: 176.7 ± 5.8 cm; body mass: 76 ± 6.8 kg and BMI: 23.1 ± 3.7 kg·m(-2)) participated in this study. Participants were randomly allocated in one of two groups, one of them performed a bout of 360 s WBV (frequency: 30 Hz; peak-to-peak displacement: 4 mm) (VIB) and the other one adopted a sham position (CON). Muscle contractile properties were analysed in the rectus femoris (RF) by using tensiomyography (TMG) 2 min before the warm-up and 2 min after intervention. Muscle damage was assessed by determining plasma creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at three time points; 5 min before warm-up and 1 h and 48 h after the intervention. TMG results showed a significant decrease in maximal displacement (p<0.05) and delay time (p<0.05) in VIB and in delay time (p<0.05) and relaxation time (p<0.05) in CON. Muscle damage markers showed significant group differences (p<0.05) for CK 1 h after the intervention. In addition, differences for CK 1 h after the intervention from baseline (p<0.05) were also observed in VIB. In conclusion, a 6-min bout of WBV results in an increase of muscle stiffness in RF and increased CK levels 1 h after intervention (returning to baseline within 48 h).
本研究旨在评估全身振动(WBV)对肌肉反应的影响,并确定该刺激是否会导致肌肉损伤。30 名健康且活跃的参与者(平均值±标准差;年龄:21.8±2.0 岁;身高:176.7±5.8cm;体重:76±6.8kg 和 BMI:23.1±3.7kg·m(-2))参与了这项研究。参与者被随机分配到两组中的一组,其中一组进行 360 秒 WBV(频率:30Hz;峰峰值位移:4mm)(VIB),另一组采用假位置(CON)。在热身前 2 分钟和干预后 2 分钟,通过张力肌描记法(TMG)分析股直肌(RF)的肌肉收缩特性。在三个时间点(热身前 5 分钟和干预后 1 小时和 48 小时)测定血浆肌酸激酶(CK)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平来评估肌肉损伤。TMG 结果显示,VIB 组的最大位移(p<0.05)和延迟时间(p<0.05)以及 CON 组的延迟时间(p<0.05)和松弛时间(p<0.05)均显著降低。肌肉损伤标志物在干预后 1 小时 CK 组间差异显著(p<0.05)。此外,VIB 组在干预后 1 小时 CK 与基线相比差异显著(p<0.05)。总之,6 分钟的全身振动会导致 RF 肌肉僵硬增加,并且在干预后 1 小时 CK 水平升高(48 小时内恢复到基线)。