• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术后阴道分娩:一项队列研究,调查与剖宫产术后阴道分娩的采用及其成功率相关的因素。

Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success.

机构信息

Office for Research and Clinical Audit, Lindsay Stewart R&D Centre, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):183-92. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12508. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.12508
PMID:24251861
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the demographic and obstetric factors associated with the uptake and success rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC).

DESIGN

Cohort study using data from Hospital Episode Statistics.

SETTING

English National Health Service.

POPULATION

Women whose first birth resulted in a live singleton delivery by caesarean section between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2011, and who had a second birth before 31 March 2012.

METHODS

Logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Attempted and successful VBAC.

RESULTS

Among the 143,970 women in the cohort, 75,086 (52.2%) attempted a VBAC for their second birth. Younger women, those of non-white ethnicity and those living in a more deprived area had higher rates of attempted VBAC. Overall, 47,602 women (63.4%) who attempted a VBAC had a successful vaginal birth. Younger women and women of white ethnicity had higher success rates. Black women had a particularly low success rate (OR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.57). Women who had an emergency caesarean section in their first birth also had a lower VBAC success rate, particularly those with a history of failed induction of labour (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.67).

CONCLUSION

In this national cohort, just over one-half of women with a primary caesarean section who were eligible for a trial of labour attempted a VBAC for their second birth. Of these, almost two-thirds successfully achieved a vaginal delivery.

摘要

目的

探讨与剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的接受度和成功率相关的人口统计学和产科因素。

设计

使用来自医院病例统计数据的队列研究。

背景

英国国家医疗服务体系。

人群

2004 年 4 月 1 日至 2011 年 3 月 31 日期间首次分娩为剖宫产活单胎分娩的妇女,且在 2012 年 3 月 31 日前再次分娩。

方法

采用逻辑回归估计调整后的优势比(OR)。

主要观察指标

尝试和成功 VBAC。

结果

在队列中的 143970 名妇女中,75086 名(52.2%)为第二次分娩尝试 VBAC。年轻女性、非白种人女性和生活在贫困地区的女性尝试 VBAC 的比例较高。总体而言,尝试 VBAC 的 47602 名妇女(63.4%)阴道分娩成功。年轻女性和白种人女性的成功率较高。黑人女性的成功率特别低(OR,0.54;95%置信区间 [CI],0.50-0.57)。在第一次分娩中进行紧急剖宫产的女性 VBAC 成功率也较低,尤其是那些有引产失败史的女性(OR,0.59;95%CI,0.53-0.67)。

结论

在这个全国性队列中,超过一半有初次剖宫产且有试产资格的女性为第二次分娩尝试 VBAC。其中,近三分之二成功实现了阴道分娩。

相似文献

1
Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:一项队列研究,调查与剖宫产术后阴道分娩的采用及其成功率相关的因素。
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):183-92. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12508. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
2
Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery in Chinese women and Western immigrants in Shanghai.中国女性与上海西方移民剖宫产术后的阴道分娩情况
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 May;37(4):446-449. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1251405. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
3
Improving VBAC rates: the combined impact of two management strategies.提高剖宫产后阴道分娩率:两种管理策略的综合影响。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Aug;54(4):327-32. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12229. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
4
Ethnic disparities in repeat caesarean rates at Auckland Hospital.奥克兰医院再次剖宫产率的种族差异。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Oct;53(5):443-50. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12078. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
5
Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China.预测剖宫产术后阴道分娩的成功率:中国的一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027807. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027807.
6
Trial of labour and vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A population based study of Eastern African immigrants in Victoria, Australia.既往剖宫产术后的引产与阴道分娩:一项基于澳大利亚维多利亚州东非移民人群的研究。
Midwifery. 2017 Mar;46:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
7
Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section.预测既往有一次剖宫产史后计划阴道分娩成功率的产前评分系统。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):339-343. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴三家教学医院中首次剖宫产(VBAC)后阴道分娩成功的相关因素:病例对照研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 1;13:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-31.
9
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: review of antenatal predictors of success.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩:成功的产前预测因素综述。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Apr;25(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31030-1.
10
Validation of updated antenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction model without race and ethnicity in Australia.在澳大利亚,验证不考虑种族和民族的更新的剖宫产术后经阴道分娩预测模型。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jun;63(3):314-320. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13619. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.尼泊尔加德满都什里·比伦德拉医院剖宫产术后阴道分娩试验的接受情况:一项描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;59(233):1-6. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5781. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
Investigating the Success Rate of Vaginal Delivery After Cesarean Section and Its Associated Factors in Afghan Women: Insights from a Maternity Hospital in Kabul.剖宫产术后阿富汗女性阴道分娩成功率及其相关因素的调查:来自喀布尔一家妇产医院的见解
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Jun 6;17:1701-1710. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S517179. eCollection 2025.
3
Application of the Robson classification in assessing cesarean section rates: an audit of a tertiary care hospital's gynecology department in Karachi, Pakistan.
罗布森分类法在评估剖宫产率中的应用:对巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家三级护理医院妇科的审计
Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2025 May 15;19:26334941251339710. doi: 10.1177/26334941251339710. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Linkage of administrative family court care proceedings and hospital records for mothers in England: linkage accuracy and cumulative incidence of family court care proceedings after a first live birth.英格兰母亲行政家庭法院照护程序与医院记录的关联:首次生育后家庭法院照护程序的关联准确性及累积发生率
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Jun 16;9(2):2404. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2404. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring barriers and facilitators of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), awareness, and preferences among females in Western Saudi Arabia.探索沙特阿拉伯西部女性剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的障碍与促进因素、认知情况及偏好。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jan;14(1):139-148. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_946_24. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
6
Impact of pandemic service changes on ethnic inequalities in maternal and perinatal outcomes in England: a population-based study.英国大流行期间服务变化对孕产妇和围产期结局种族不平等的影响:一项基于人群的研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):e090359. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090359.
7
May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study.既往剖宫产指征是否会影响引产女性试产的结局?一项回顾性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):194-202. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15005. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
8
Delivery Progress, Labor Interventions and Perinatal Outcome in Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery of Singleton Pregnancies between Nulliparous and Primiparous Women with One Previous Elective Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Comparative Study.初产妇与经产妇且有一次择期剖宫产史的单胎妊娠自然阴道分娩的分娩进程、分娩干预措施及围产期结局:一项回顾性比较研究
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 5;13(10):2016. doi: 10.3390/life13102016.
9
Vaginal birth after cesarean section and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术后阴道分娩及其相关因素的研究进展:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 15;13(1):7882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34856-8.
10
Iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm birth in England: A population-based cohort study.英格兰的医源性和自发性早产:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17291. Epub 2022 Oct 3.