Belihu Fetene B, Small Rhonda, Davey Mary-Ann
Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Midwifery. 2017 Mar;46:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
Variations in caesarean section (CS) between some immigrant groups and receiving country populations have been widely reported. Often, African immigrant women are at higher risk of CS than the receiving population in developed countries. However, evidence about subsequent mode of birth following CS for African women post-migration is lacking. The objective of this study was to examine differences in attempted and successful vaginal birth after previous caesarean (VBAC) for Eastern African immigrants (Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia and Sudan) compared with Australian-born women.
A population-based observational study was conducted using the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection. Pearson's chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were performed to generate adjusted odds ratios for attempted and successful VBAC.
Victoria, Australia.
554 Eastern African immigrants and 24,587 Australian-born eligible women with previous CS having singleton births in public care.
41.5% of Eastern African immigrant women and 26.1% Australian-born women attempted a VBAC with 50.9% of Eastern African immigrants and 60.5% of Australian-born women being successful. After adjusting for maternal demographic characteristics and available clinical confounding factors, Eastern African immigrants were more likely to attempt (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.57-2.47) but less likely to succeed (OR 0.54 95% CI 0.41-0.71) in having a VBAC.
CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There are disparities in attempted and successful VBAC between Eastern African origin and Australian-born women. Unsuccessful VBAC attempt is more common among Eastern African immigrants, suggesting the need for improved strategies to select and support potential candidates for vaginal birth among these immigrants to enhance success and reduce potential complications associated with failed VBAC attempt.
一些移民群体与接受国人群之间剖宫产(CS)情况的差异已有广泛报道。通常,在发达国家,非洲移民女性进行剖宫产的风险高于接受国人群。然而,关于非洲女性移民后剖宫产后续分娩方式的证据尚缺。本研究的目的是探讨东非移民(厄立特里亚、埃塞俄比亚、索马里和苏丹)与澳大利亚出生的女性相比,既往剖宫产术后试产及成功阴道分娩(VBAC)的差异。
利用维多利亚围产期数据收集进行一项基于人群的观察性研究。采用Pearson卡方检验和逻辑回归分析来生成试产及成功VBAC的调整比值比。
澳大利亚维多利亚州。
554名东非移民以及24,587名在公共医疗体系中有既往剖宫产史且单胎分娩的澳大利亚出生的符合条件女性。
41.5%的东非移民女性和26.1%的澳大利亚出生女性尝试进行VBAC,其中50.9%的东非移民和60.5%的澳大利亚出生女性成功进行了VBAC。在调整了产妇人口统计学特征和可用的临床混杂因素后,东非移民更有可能尝试VBAC(比值比1.94,95%置信区间1.57 - 2.47),但成功的可能性较小(比值比0.54,95%置信区间0.41 - 0.71)。
结论/对实践的启示:东非裔女性与澳大利亚出生的女性在试产及成功VBAC方面存在差异。VBAC试产失败在东非移民中更为常见,这表明需要改进策略,以筛选并支持这些移民中可能进行阴道分娩的候选人,从而提高成功率并减少与VBAC试产失败相关的潜在并发症。