Department of Psychology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan.
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 May;125(5):971-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
The aim of this study was to compare the different features that musicians and non-musicians rely upon when they discern consonant and dissonant intervals. Previous studies have addressed this issue from the perspective of either the frequency ratio (Western music theory) or the frequency difference (psychoacoustics), but have not considered both features in a single and balanced study.
Twelve musicians and twelve non-musicians judged musical consonance at various 50-500 Hz intervals, orthogonally selected from across the "pitch interval" and "roughness" spectrum. Both behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) data were collected separately.
Behavioral results demonstrated that while musicians relied upon pitch intervals (between perfect fifths and tritones, with 95% accuracy), non-musicians performed around chance. The latter performance could, however, be sub-divided into "rough tritone and non-rough perfect-fifth" (70-80%) and "non-rough tritone and rough perfect-fifth" combinations (25-30%), suggesting non-musicians' reliance on the roughness dimension. ERP components revealed corresponding P2 (200-250 ms) amplitude differences in the Fz and Cz channels for the "tritones vs. perfect fifths" comparison in musicians, and by the "rough vs. non-rough" comparison in the non-musicians. In addition, N1 (∼100 ms) and N2 (300-400 ms) components also revealed difference in Fz, F3, F4, FCz, Cz and CPz electrodes for "tritones vs. perfect fifths" in musicians. In the non-musicians, a stronger negative N2 for rough than for non-rough stimuli was found at F4 and Cz.
Together, these results suggest that musicians and non-musicians rely upon pitch intervals and sensory roughness, respectively, for consonance/dissonance perception.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare independently across the pitch interval and roughness spectrum. Our results further support the brain plasticity as a result of musical training in consonance perception.
本研究旨在比较音乐家和非音乐家在辨别协和和不协和音程时所依赖的不同特征。之前的研究从频率比(西方音乐理论)或频率差(心理声学)的角度探讨了这个问题,但没有在一个单一和平衡的研究中同时考虑这两个特征。
12 名音乐家和 12 名非音乐家在横跨“音高间隔”和“粗糙度”频谱的各种 50-500Hz 间隔上判断音乐的协和度,实验分别采集了行为和事件相关电位(ERP)数据。
行为结果表明,音乐家依赖于音高间隔(从完全五度到三全音,准确率为 95%),而非音乐家的表现则随机。然而,这种表现可以进一步细分为“粗糙三全音和非粗糙完全五度”(70-80%)和“非粗糙三全音和粗糙完全五度”组合(25-30%),表明非音乐家依赖于粗糙度维度。ERP 成分揭示了在 Fz 和 Cz 通道中音乐家在“三全音与完全五度”比较中 P2(200-250ms)振幅的对应差异,以及非音乐家在“粗糙与非粗糙”比较中的差异。此外,N1(约 100ms)和 N2(300-400ms)成分在 Fz、F3、F4、FCz、Cz 和 CPz 电极上也显示出音乐家在“三全音与完全五度”比较中的差异。在非音乐家中,与非粗糙刺激相比,粗糙刺激在 F4 和 Cz 电极上产生更强的负 N2。
总的来说,这些结果表明,音乐家和非音乐家分别依赖音高间隔和感官粗糙度来感知协和/不协和。
据我们所知,这是第一个独立比较音高间隔和粗糙度谱的研究。我们的结果进一步支持了音乐训练对协和感知的大脑可塑性。