Suppr超能文献

小儿运动测试中的仰卧位骑自行车:性能指标的差异

Supine cycling in pediatric exercise testing: disparity in performance measures.

作者信息

May Lindsay J, Punn Rajesh, Olson Inger, Kazmucha Jeffrey A, Liu Michael Y, Chin Clifford

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, 750 Welch Road, Suite # 325, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA,

出版信息

Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Apr;35(4):705-10. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0841-y. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Abstract

Supine cycling may be an important alternative modality for exercise testing. Subtle differences in supine and upright exercise physiology have been suggested but not fully explored in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to compare peak and submaximal metabolic data in the upright and supine exercise positions. Healthy children (N = 100) performed cardiopulmonary exercise tests using supine and upright cycle ergometry. Recruitment was governed by grant funding and not based on sample size calculations. Subjects exercised to exhaustion. Paired Student's t-tests were used to compare upright and supine data; simple linear regression analyses examined correlations between the two modalities. Peak heart rate was similar in both testing positions. Although peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (VO2@AT), VO2 when the respiratory exchange ratio is consistently at or above 1.0 (VO2@RER1.0), and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope were significantly higher in the upright position, no difference was considered of practical significance when applying Cohen's effect size criteria. Therefore, it may be reasonable for pediatric exercise laboratories to use established normative data and predictions for upright cycling position and apply them to metabolic measures obtained in supine exercise testing. Supine cycling with submaximal parameters may allow objective assessment of exercise capacity in children who undergo exercise echocardiography or cannot perform upright exercise testing.

摘要

仰卧位骑行可能是运动测试的一种重要替代方式。仰卧位和直立位运动生理学存在细微差异,这一点已被提出,但在儿科人群中尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是比较直立位和仰卧位运动时的峰值和次最大代谢数据。健康儿童(N = 100)采用仰卧位和直立位自行车测力计进行心肺运动测试。招募受资助资金的限制,而非基于样本量计算。受试者运动至 exhaustion。采用配对学生 t 检验比较直立位和仰卧位数据;简单线性回归分析检验两种方式之间的相关性。两个测试位置的峰值心率相似。尽管直立位时的峰值摄氧量(峰值 VO2)、无氧阈时的摄氧量(VO2@AT)、呼吸交换率持续处于或高于 1.0 时的 VO2(VO2@RER1.0)以及摄氧量效率斜率显著更高,但应用 Cohen 效应量标准时,未发现差异具有实际意义。因此,儿科运动实验室使用既定的直立位骑行规范数据和预测值,并将其应用于仰卧位运动测试获得的代谢指标,可能是合理的。具有次最大参数的仰卧位骑行可能有助于对接受运动超声心动图检查或无法进行直立位运动测试的儿童的运动能力进行客观评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验