Quinn T J, Smith S W, Vroman N B, Kertzer R, Olney W B
University of New Hampshire, Department of Kinesiology, Durham 03824, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Mar;76(3):257-61. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80612-1.
Physiological responses were compared in nine stable male cardiac patients (mean +/- standard error (SE): age, 68.3 +/- 8.1 years; height, 172.7 +/- 3.9cm; weight, 72.8 +/- 14.5kg) during stationary cycling in the supine, recumbent, and upright positions. A discontinuous exercise protocol was performed in which each stage included 3 minutes of exercise and 1 minute of recovery. Each subject's workload started at 150kgm.min-1 and increased by 150kgm.min-1 per stage until volitional fatigue. Testing sessions were randomized and performed 1 week apart. Subjects continued their normal medication regimen. All subjects were participants in a community-based cardiac rehabilitation program. Dependent variables were assessed at two different intensities; submaximal (300kgm.min +/- 1) and maximal. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA found no significant differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), minute ventilation (VE), respiratory exchange ratio (R), rate pressure product (RPP), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) at submaximal (300kgm.min +/- 1) and maximal exercise efforts. Heart rate (HR) was significantly lower (p < or = .05) in the supine position compared with either the upright or recumbent positions during the submaximal workload. In addition, oxygen uptake (VO2) was significantly lower in the supine position at the submaximal workload (p < or = .05) compared with both upright and recumbent. No difference in HR or VO2 was observed at maximal exercise. Regressions of HR on VO2 showed similar slopes and intercepts for supine, recumbent, and upright ergometry.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对9名病情稳定的男性心脏病患者(平均±标准误差(SE):年龄68.3±8.1岁;身高172.7±3.9厘米;体重72.8±14.5千克)在仰卧、斜躺和直立位进行静态骑行时的生理反应进行了比较。采用间断运动方案,每个阶段包括3分钟运动和1分钟恢复。每位受试者的工作量从150千克米/分钟开始,每个阶段增加150千克米/分钟,直至自愿疲劳。测试环节随机安排,间隔1周进行。受试者继续其正常药物治疗方案。所有受试者均参与了一项基于社区的心脏康复计划。在两种不同强度下评估了因变量;次最大强度(300千克米/分钟±1)和最大强度。双向重复测量方差分析发现,在次最大强度(300千克米/分钟±1)和最大运动强度下,收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、分钟通气量(VE)、呼吸交换率(R)、心率血压乘积(RPP)和自觉用力程度分级(RPE)无显著差异。在次最大工作量期间,仰卧位的心率(HR)显著低于直立位或斜躺位(p≤0.05)。此外,在次最大工作量时,仰卧位的摄氧量(VO2)显著低于直立位和斜躺位(p≤0.05)。在最大运动时,未观察到HR或VO2的差异。HR对VO2的回归显示,仰卧、斜躺和直立测力计的斜率和截距相似。(摘要截断于250字)