Discipline of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jan;29(1):155-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det407. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
Does time in casual employment (while not studying full time) affect the likelihood of a woman having a child by age 35?
Duration of time spent in casual employment is associated with an increased likelihood of childlessness at age 35 years, irrespective of socio-economic background as indicated by educational level.
Precarious employment conditions have become increasingly prevalent in recent decades in Western countries. The relationship between precarious employment conditions and age at first childbirth has been examined in several European countries with varying results.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective cross-sectional component (n = 663) was added to an existing study based on a cohort of women born during 1973-1975. An event history calendar instrument was used to obtain data regarding a range of life domains over a 20-year period.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Using data from the Life Journeys of Young Women Project carried out in Adelaide, South Australia, Cox proportional hazards models were applied to investigate the research questions.
The likelihood of childbirth by around age 35 was reduced for every year spent in casual employment, irrespective of socioeconomic status, partner's education and parents' birthplace. The likelihood was reduced by 8, 23 and 35% for 1, 3 and 5 years spent in casual employment, respectively.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Women with longer employment histories (and greater age at first birth) had more opportunities for errors in recall, but it is unlikely that such errors were systematic and led to bias in the results. While we included variables reflecting partner's education and length of time with a live-in partner, partner's employment histories were not taken into account.
Duration of time spent in casual employment is associated with an increased likelihood of childlessness at age 35 years, and this association is present across the spectrum of socioeconomic status. We suggest that upstream labour market reforms could be considered in order to reduce barriers to childbearing.
非全日制就业(未全日制学习)的时间是否会影响女性在 35 岁时生育孩子的可能性?
无论受教育程度如何(以教育水平为指标),非全日制就业时间的长短与 35 岁时的不孕可能性增加有关。
在过去几十年中,不稳定的就业条件在西方国家变得越来越普遍。在一些欧洲国家,已经研究了不稳定的就业条件与初育年龄之间的关系,但结果各不相同。
研究设计、大小、持续时间:在阿德莱德(澳大利亚南部)进行的一项基于 1973-1975 年出生的女性队列的现有研究中增加了回顾性横断面部分(n=663)。使用事件历史日历工具获得了 20 年内一系列生命领域的数据。
参与者/材料、地点、方法:使用南澳大利亚阿德莱德的“年轻女性生活历程”项目的数据,应用 Cox 比例风险模型来研究研究问题。
无论社会经济地位、伴侣的教育程度和父母的出生地如何,每在非全日制就业中度过一年,生育的可能性就会降低。分别有 1 年、3 年和 5 年的非全日制就业经历,生育的可能性分别降低了 8%、23%和 35%。
局限性、谨慎原因:就业历史较长(初次生育年龄较大)的女性有更多机会出现记忆错误,但不太可能这些错误是系统性的,导致结果出现偏差。虽然我们包括了反映伴侣教育程度和与同居伴侣相处时间长短的变量,但没有考虑伴侣的就业历史。
非全日制就业时间的长短与 35 岁时不孕的可能性增加有关,这种关联存在于社会经济地位的各个层面。我们建议可以考虑进行劳动力市场的上游改革,以减少生育障碍。