• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

35至43岁未育同居及单身女性在寻求生育评估和咨询时关于推迟生育的家庭意愿和个人考量。

Family intentions and personal considerations on postponing childbearing in childless cohabiting and single women aged 35-43 seeking fertility assessment and counselling.

作者信息

Birch Petersen K, Hvidman H W, Sylvest R, Pinborg A, Larsen E C, Macklon K T, Andersen A Nyboe, Schmidt L

机构信息

Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2563-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev237. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/dev237
PMID:26401054
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

What characterizes childless women aged 35 years and above seeking fertility assessment and counselling in relation to their reproduction and are there significant differences between single and cohabiting women?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Despite the women's advanced age and knowledge of the age-related decline in fecundity, 70% of the single women sought fertility assessment and counselling to gain knowledge regarding the possibility of postponing pregnancy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Recent studies have indicated an increasing demand for ovarian reserve testing in women without any known fertility problem to obtain knowledge on their reproductive lifespan and pro-fertility advice. Women postpone their first pregnancy, and maternal age at first birth has increased in western societies over the past two to four decades. Postponed childbearing implies a higher rate of involuntary childlessness, smaller families than desired and declining fertility rates.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, AND DURATION: Baseline data from a cross-sectional cohort study of 340 women aged 35-43 years examined at the Fertility Assessment and Counselling (FAC) Clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital from 2011 to 2014. The FAC Clinic was initiated to provide individual fertility assessment and counselling.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eligible women were childless and at least 35 years of age. All completed a web-based questionnaire before and after the consultation including socio-demographic, reproductive, medical, lifestyle and behavioural factors. Consultation by a fertility specialist included transvaginal ultrasound, full reproductive history and AMH measurement.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The study comprised 140 cohabiting and 200 single women. The majority (82%) were well-educated and in employment. Their mean age was 37.4 years. Nonetheless, the main reasons for attending were to obtain knowledge regarding the possibility of postponing pregnancy (63%) and a concern about their fecundity (52%). The majority in both groups (60%) wished for two or more children. The women listed their ideal age at birth of first child and last child as 33 (±4.7) years and 39 (±3.5) years, respectively. Of the single women, 70% would accept use of sperm donation compared with 25% of the cohabiting women (P < 0.001). In general, 45% considered oocyte vitrification for social reasons, yet only 15% were positive towards oocyte donation. The two groups were comparable regarding lifestyle factors, number of previous sexual partners, pregnancies, and ovarian reserve parameters.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The women in the present study were conscious of the risk of infertility with increasing age and attended the FAC Clinic due to a concern about their remaining reproductive lifespan, which in combination with their high educational level could impair the generalizability to the background population.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The results indicate that in general women overestimate their own reproductive capacity and underestimate the risk of future childlessness with the continuous postponement of pregnancies.

摘要

研究问题

35岁及以上寻求生育评估和咨询的未育女性在生殖方面有哪些特点,单身女性和同居女性之间是否存在显著差异?

总结答案

尽管这些女性年龄较大且知晓生育能力随年龄下降,但70%的单身女性寻求生育评估和咨询是为了了解推迟怀孕的可能性。

已知信息

近期研究表明,在没有已知生育问题的女性中,对卵巢储备检测的需求不断增加,以了解自己的生殖寿命并获得促进生育的建议。女性推迟首次怀孕,在过去二至四十年间,西方社会的初育产妇年龄有所增加。推迟生育意味着非意愿性不育率上升、家庭规模小于预期以及生育率下降。

研究设计、规模与持续时间:这是一项横断面队列研究的基线数据,研究对象为2011年至2014年在哥本哈根大学医院生育评估与咨询(FAC)诊所接受检查的340名35 - 43岁女性。FAC诊所旨在提供个性化的生育评估和咨询。

研究对象/材料、研究环境、研究方法:符合条件的女性为未育且年龄至少35岁。所有女性在咨询前后均完成了一份基于网络的问卷,内容包括社会人口统计学、生殖、医学、生活方式和行为因素。生育专家的咨询包括经阴道超声检查、完整的生殖史和抗缪勒管激素(AMH)测量。

主要结果及机遇的作用

该研究包括140名同居女性和200名单身女性。大多数(82%)女性受过良好教育且有工作。她们的平均年龄为37.4岁。然而,就诊的主要原因是了解推迟怀孕的可能性(63%)以及对自身生育能力的担忧(52%)。两组中的大多数(60%)希望生育两个或更多孩子。这些女性将她们理想的头胎生育年龄和末胎生育年龄分别列为33(±4.7)岁和39(±3.5)岁。在单身女性中,70%会接受使用捐赠精子,而同居女性中这一比例为25%(P < 0.001)。总体而言,45%的女性出于社会原因考虑卵子玻璃化保存,但只有15%对卵子捐赠持积极态度。两组在生活方式因素、既往性伴侣数量、怀孕次数和卵巢储备参数方面具有可比性。

局限性、需谨慎的原因:本研究中的女性意识到随着年龄增长不孕的风险,且因担心剩余生殖寿命而前往FAC诊所就诊,再加上她们的高教育水平,这可能会影响研究结果对总体人群的推广性。

研究结果的更广泛影响

结果表明,总体而言,随着怀孕的持续推迟,女性高估了自己的生殖能力,低估了未来不育的风险。

相似文献

1
Family intentions and personal considerations on postponing childbearing in childless cohabiting and single women aged 35-43 seeking fertility assessment and counselling.35至43岁未育同居及单身女性在寻求生育评估和咨询时关于推迟生育的家庭意愿和个人考量。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2563-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev237. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
2
Individual fertility assessment and counselling in women of reproductive age.育龄期女性的个体生育力评估与咨询
Dan Med J. 2016 Oct;63(10).
3
Ovarian reserve assessment in users of oral contraception seeking fertility advice on their reproductive lifespan.口服避孕药使用者的卵巢储备评估,以寻求对其生殖寿命的生育建议。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2364-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev197. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Women's perceptions of fertility assessment and counselling 6 years after attending a Fertility Assessment and Counselling clinic in Denmark.丹麦一家生育评估与咨询诊所就诊6年后,女性对生育评估与咨询的看法。
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Oct 5;2020(4):hoaa036. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa036. eCollection 2020.
5
Individual fertility assessment and pro-fertility counselling; should this be offered to women and men of reproductive age?个体生育力评估与促生育咨询;是否应向育龄男女提供此项服务?
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):9-15. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu305. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
6
Psychosocial experiences of involuntary definitive childless women: a comparative study based on reproductive status.非自愿性永久性不孕女性的心理社会体验:基于生殖状态的比较研究。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Mar 1;39(3):559-568. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae001.
7
Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction.加拿大无子女男性和女性的生育意愿、对辅助生殖技术的态度以及使用辅助生殖技术的意愿。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Aug;27(8):2405-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des190. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
8
Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons.无子女女性出于社会和医学原因对卵母细胞冷冻的信念和认知。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2313-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew189. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
9
Do children make you happier? Sustained child-wish and mental health in women 11-17 years after fertility treatment.孩子会让你更幸福吗?生育治疗后11至17年女性的持续生育意愿与心理健康。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2238-46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu178. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
10
Attitudes towards family formation in cohabiting and single childless women in their mid- to late thirties.三十五六岁至近四十岁的同居及单身无子女女性对组建家庭的态度。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016 Apr;19(1):48-55. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2016.1156171. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptance rates and reasons for social oocyte cryopreservation among women: systematic review and meta-analysis.女性社会卵子冷冻保存的接受率及原因:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar 1. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03425-5.
2
An integrated theory based-educational intervention to change intention to have a child: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于综合理论的教育干预以改变生育意愿:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2024 Feb 28;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01760-x.
3
Situating commercialization of assisted reproduction in its socio-political context: a critical interpretive synthesis.
将辅助生殖商业化置于其社会政治背景下:一项批判性解释性综述
Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Nov 21;2022(4):hoac052. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac052. eCollection 2022.
4
Aging conundrum: A perspective for ovarian aging.衰老之谜:卵巢衰老的视角。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 19;13:952471. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.952471. eCollection 2022.
5
Women's perceptions of fertility assessment and counselling 6 years after attending a Fertility Assessment and Counselling clinic in Denmark.丹麦一家生育评估与咨询诊所就诊6年后,女性对生育评估与咨询的看法。
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Oct 5;2020(4):hoaa036. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa036. eCollection 2020.
6
Regret over the delay in childbearing decision negatively associates with life satisfaction among Japanese women and men seeking fertility treatment: a cross-sectional study.对于生育决策的延迟感到遗憾与寻求生育治疗的日本男女的生活满意度呈负相关:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;20(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09025-5.
7
Future Perspectives of POSEIDON Stratification for Clinical Practice and Research.POSEIDON分层在临床实践和研究中的未来展望
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 11;10:439. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00439. eCollection 2019.
8
Status one year after fertility assessment and counselling in women of reproductive age-a qualitative study.生育评估和咨询后一年的状况:一项定性研究。
Ups J Med Sci. 2018 Dec;123(4):264-270. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1546243. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
Initiating patient discussions about oocyte cryopreservation: Attitudes of obstetrics and gynaecology resident physicians.启动关于卵母细胞冷冻保存的患者讨论:妇产科住院医师的态度
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 7;6:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.011. eCollection 2018 Aug.
10
Development and Psychometric Properties of The Delayed Childbearing Questionnaire (DCBQ-55).《晚育调查问卷(DCBQ - 55)》的编制与心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Sep 23;6(4):120. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6040120.