• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不稳定就业安排与社会脆弱性之间的关系:来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩 PREMIS 研究的结果。

The Relation Between Precarious Employment Arrangements and Social Precarity: Findings from the PREMIS Study in Stockholm, Sweden.

机构信息

Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, 27106Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.

Health Inequalities Research Group, Employment Conditions Knowledge Network (GREDS-EMCONET), 16770Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2022 Apr;52(2):201-211. doi: 10.1177/00207314211051880. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1177/00207314211051880
PMID:34817272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8894623/
Abstract

Precarious employment (PE) is a well-known social determinant of health and health inequalities. However, as most previous studies have focused on physical and mental well-being, less is known about the social-related outcomes (ie, social precarity) associated with precarious arrangements. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate whether PE is associated with social precarity in a working population of 401 nonstandard employed workers in Stockholm, Sweden (2016-2017). PE was assessed with the Swedish version of the Employment Precarious Scale (EPRES-Se) and analyzed in relation to social precarity related to working life (eg, task quality and job security) and living conditions (eg, restraint in social activities and financial constraints). We found positive adjusted associations between quartiles of EPRES-Se and social precarity related to working life (eg, being locked in an occupation [aPR:1.33 [1.10-1.61]]) and living conditions (eg, inability to participate in social activities because of work [aPR:1.27 [1.10-1.46]]). Our findings suggest that individuals in PE experience social precarity, stressing that PE may have negative effects on well-being. Further studies using multidimensional constructs of PE and larger samples should analyze these findings according to social and policy contexts in order to be able to inform policymakers.

摘要

不稳定就业(PE)是众所周知的健康和健康不平等的社会决定因素。然而,由于大多数先前的研究都集中在身心健康上,因此对于与不稳定安排相关的社会相关结果(即社会不稳定)知之甚少。本横断面研究旨在调查在瑞典斯德哥尔摩的 401 名非标准就业工人的工作人群中,PE 是否与社会不稳定有关(2016-2017 年)。PE 采用瑞典版就业不稳定量表(EPRES-Se)进行评估,并与与工作生活相关的社会不稳定(例如,工作任务质量和工作保障)和生活条件(例如,社会活动受限和经济拮据)相关联进行分析。我们发现 EPRES-Se 四分位间距与与工作生活相关的社会不稳定(例如,被锁定在一个职业中[aPR:1.33 [1.10-1.61])和生活条件(例如,由于工作而无法参加社交活动[aPR:1.27 [1.10-1.46])之间存在正相关调整关系。我们的研究结果表明,PE 个体经历社会不稳定,这强调了 PE 可能对幸福感产生负面影响。进一步使用 PE 的多维结构和更大的样本进行的研究,应根据社会和政策背景分析这些发现,以便为决策者提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf90/8894623/1aa8809c8e33/10.1177_00207314211051880-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf90/8894623/1aa8809c8e33/10.1177_00207314211051880-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf90/8894623/1aa8809c8e33/10.1177_00207314211051880-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Relation Between Precarious Employment Arrangements and Social Precarity: Findings from the PREMIS Study in Stockholm, Sweden.不稳定就业安排与社会脆弱性之间的关系:来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩 PREMIS 研究的结果。
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Apr;52(2):201-211. doi: 10.1177/00207314211051880. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
Precarious employment and general, mental and physical health in Stockholm, Sweden: a cross-sectional study.在瑞典斯德哥尔摩,不稳定就业与总体健康、精神健康和身体健康:一项横断面研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Mar;49(2):228-236. doi: 10.1177/1403494820956451. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Measuring precarious employment in Sweden: translation, adaptation and psychometric properties of the Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES).衡量瑞典的不稳定就业:就业不稳定量表(EPRES)的翻译、改编及心理测量特性
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e029577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029577.
4
Precarious employment and mental health in the Belgian service voucher system: the role of working conditions and perceived financial strain.比利时服务券制度中的不稳定就业与心理健康:工作条件和感知财务压力的作用。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 May;97(4):435-450. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02057-z. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
5
Precarious employment and mental health in the United States: Results from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2008-2021.美国不稳定就业与心理健康:来自 2008-2021 年医疗支出调查(MEPS)的结果。
Prev Med. 2024 Sep;186:108090. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108090. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
Precarious Employment and Psychosocial Hazards: A Cross-Sectional Study in Stockholm County.不稳定就业与心身危害:斯德哥尔摩县的一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11218. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111218.
7
A performance assessment of web-based respondent driven sampling among workers with precarious employment in Sweden.基于网络的应答驱动抽样在瑞典不稳定就业工人中的表现评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210183. eCollection 2019.
8
The importance of using a multi-dimensional scale to capture the various impacts of precarious employment on health: Results from a national survey of Chilean workers.使用多维尺度来捕捉不稳定性就业对健康的各种影响的重要性:来自智利全国工人调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0238401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238401. eCollection 2020.
9
The gendered associations between precarious employment and mental health in working-age Australians: A longitudinal analysis using 16 waves of the HILDA survey.工作年龄段澳大利亚人之间不稳定就业与心理健康之间的性别关联:使用 HILDA 调查 16 个波次的纵向分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;339:116382. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116382. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
10
Employment Precarity and Increased Risk of Hazardous Occupational Exposures Among Residents of High Socioeconomic Hardship Neighborhoods.高社会经济困难社区居民的就业不稳定与危险职业暴露风险增加。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Nov 15;66(9):1122-1135. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac062.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Precarious Employment and Cognitive Decline: A Longitudinal Study of Middle-Aged and Older Workers in Korea.不稳定就业与认知衰退之间的关联:韩国中年及老年劳动者的纵向研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09617-0.
2
The Challenge of Exposing and Ending Health Inequalities through Social and Policy Change: Canadian Experiences.通过社会和政策变革消除健康不平等的挑战:加拿大的经验
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2023 Apr;53(2):130-145. doi: 10.1177/27551938221148376. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
Could Better-Quality Employment Improve Population Health? Findings From a Scoping Review of Multi-Dimensional Employment Quality Research and a Proposed Research Direction.

本文引用的文献

1
What's casual? What's causal? Advancing research on employment relationships and health.什么是偶然的?什么是因果关系的?推进关于雇佣关系与健康的研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan;78(1):1-3. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-107136. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Measuring Precarious Employment: Type of Contract Can Lead to Serious Misclassification Error.衡量不稳定就业:合同类型可能导致严重的分类错误。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Nov 16;64(9):1035-1038. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa089.
3
Diverting blame to stay sane - young people's strategies for dealing with the mental health effects of precarious employment: a grounded theory study.
更高质量的就业能否改善人口健康?多维就业质量研究的范围综述结果及拟议的研究方向
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Mar;68(3):225-249. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23695. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
4
A Systematic Review of Evaluated Labor Market Initiatives Addressing Precarious Employment: Findings and Public Health Implications.关于应对不稳定就业的劳动力市场举措评估的系统综述:研究结果及对公共卫生的影响
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2025 Jul;55(3):268-288. doi: 10.1177/27551938241310120. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
5
Precarious employment and mental health in the United States: Results from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2008-2021.美国不稳定就业与心理健康:来自 2008-2021 年医疗支出调查(MEPS)的结果。
Prev Med. 2024 Sep;186:108090. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108090. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
The relationships between precarious employment, having a calling, and occupational well-being among young nurses: a cross-sectional study.不稳定就业、使命感与年轻护士职业幸福感的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):762. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11220-8.
7
The effects of precarious employment and calling on the psychosocial health and work well-being of young and older workers in the care sector: a longitudinal study.不稳定就业和职业呼唤对护理行业中青年和老年工作者的心理社会健康和工作幸福感的影响:一项纵向研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Dec;96(10):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-02017-z. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
8
Employment trajectories and mental health-related disability in Belgium.比利时的就业轨迹与心理健康相关残疾
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Mar;96(2):285-302. doi: 10.1007/s00420-022-01923-y. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
转移责任以保持理智——年轻人应对不稳定就业心理健康影响的策略:扎根理论研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08626-4.
4
What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies.什么是不稳定就业?对来自定量和定性研究的定义和操作化的系统综述。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 May 1;46(3):235-247. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3875. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
5
Precarious employment in occupational health - an OMEGA-NET working group position paper.职业健康中的脆弱就业状况——OMEGA-NET 工作组立场文件。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 May 1;46(3):321-329. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3860. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
6
The longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA) and its use in medical research.医疗保险和劳动力市场研究的纵向综合数据库(LISA)及其在医学研究中的应用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;34(4):423-437. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00511-8. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
7
A performance assessment of web-based respondent driven sampling among workers with precarious employment in Sweden.基于网络的应答驱动抽样在瑞典不稳定就业工人中的表现评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210183. eCollection 2019.
8
Authors' response to "Multiple-job holding is not a type of precarious employment".作者对《从事多份工作并非不稳定就业的一种类型》的回应。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jan 1;45(1):100. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3789. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Multiple-job holding is not a type of precarious employment.从事多份工作并非一种不稳定的就业形式。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jan 1;45(1):98-99. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3782. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Precarious employment and occupational accidents and injuries - a systematic review.不稳定就业与职业事故和伤害——系统综述。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jul 1;44(4):341-350. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3720. Epub 2018 Feb 14.