University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;48(13):1014-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
While research on chronic ankle instability (CAI) and awareness of its impact on society and health care systems has grown substantially in the last 2 decades, the inconsistency in participant/patient selection criteria across studies presents a potential obstacle to addressing the problem properly. This major gap within the literature limits the ability to generalise this evidence to the target patient population. Therefore, there is a need to provide standards for patient/participant selection criteria in research focused on CAI with justifications using the best available evidence. The International Ankle Consortium provides this position paper to present and discuss an endorsed set of selection criteria for patients with CAI based on the best available evidence to be used in future research and study designs. These recommendations will enhance the validity of research conducted in this clinical population with the end goal of bringing the research evidence to the clinician and patient.
尽管过去 20 年来,慢性踝关节不稳定 (CAI) 的研究以及对其对社会和医疗保健系统的影响的认识有了实质性的增长,但研究中参与者/患者选择标准的不一致性是正确解决该问题的潜在障碍。文献中的这一主要差距限制了将该证据推广到目标患者人群的能力。因此,需要提供针对 CAI 研究的患者/参与者选择标准的标准,并使用最佳现有证据为其提供理由。国际踝关节联合会提供这份立场文件,旨在根据最佳现有证据提出并讨论一组经过认可的 CAI 患者选择标准,以用于未来的研究和研究设计。这些建议将提高在这一临床人群中进行的研究的有效性,最终目标是将研究证据带给临床医生和患者。