Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; ; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2013 Oct;5(5):678-82. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.09.11.
Lung cancer, as the leading cause of cancer-related motility and mortality worldwide, usually ends up with poor prognosis, despite abundant progress of therapeutic approaches. Early diagnosis and staging is extremely critical and directly affects clinical managements and outcomes. Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), serving as an effective tool, has been widely used for mediastinal and hilar lung cancer staging. Recent advance in bronchoscopy introduces ultrasound probe to regular bronchoscope, resulting in TBNA procedures real-time visualized. Here, we summarize the advantages and disadvantages of conventional TBNA (cTBNA) and ultrasound-guided TBNA by comparing the instruments, methodology as well as the anatomy. We believe these two techniques are not competitive but complementary, judging the indications of patients for different technique would be a raising issue applied for pulmonologists.
肺癌是全球癌症相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因,尽管治疗方法有了很大的进展,但通常预后较差。早期诊断和分期至关重要,直接影响临床管理和结果。经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)作为一种有效的工具,已广泛用于纵隔和肺门肺癌的分期。支气管镜的最新进展将超声探头引入常规支气管镜,使 TBNA 程序实时可视化。在这里,我们通过比较仪器、方法和解剖结构,总结了传统 TBNA(cTBNA)和超声引导 TBNA 的优缺点。我们认为这两种技术不是竞争关系,而是互补关系,根据患者的不同情况选择不同的技术将是一个悬而未决的问题,这需要肺科医生来判断。